Deactivated_20191124_01
@pixel
Honest accounts of vore fetishism aren’t numeral enough to see many clear patterns, and even if an account of vorephelia is reported honestly it’s hard to tell if additional fetishes mentioned aren’t just an attempt to create an image of normality.
Furthermore most instances of vore material are not based on physical or realistic phenomena (like diapers for example), and just like the Willywonka Blueberry girl thing the fetish fringes on concepts that are highly cultural and contrived.
I can see and imagine more furry instances of vore fetishism occurring. Snakes for example need live prey to thrive, and consuming the live animal is some of the only excitement you will ever see from this otherwise dormant creature.
Lots of kids movies are centered around the vulnerability of small mammals were carnivorous creatures are made out to be villains, and any approachable spinoff of the carnivorous villian is probaly going to be the ‘light diner’ that likes to play with his food, and emotionally charged encounters with his prey could end in some kind of demented romance, or other excuse for the adorable animal to not be consumed in front of the target kids audience.
As for the actual consumption there appears to be two versions. Soft core and hard core vore. Soft core being the more popular one where the consumption is reduced to some non fatal organic copulation, and hard core vore being based on the raw reality of being chewed up and digested.
Understanding the difference between these two can help us understand the cognitive dissonance and pathologies that allow such a fetish to exist, and help us understand the fetish as a whole.
The fact the soft core version is more popular than the more realistic, emotionally charged counterpart can mean many things. In science if we want something to be true, we try to assume it’s not, so one assumption to consider is personal or interpersonal dishonesty being prevalent. There is much more to consider. The actual occurrence of death seems to be a roadblock in even the most demented pathologies. People explicitly into the dead might have mechanisms that keep them from fully realizing what death (or life) means.
The theme of death goes on to also separate balloon fetishism. For many people the popping of balloons is analog to the orgasm, but a lot of balloon fetishist equate this to the death of the balloon, and can even become emotionally distraught from balloon popping.
I’m coming back to this. Just going to eat and see what others have to add.
Honest accounts of vore fetishism aren’t numeral enough to see many clear patterns, and even if an account of vorephelia is reported honestly it’s hard to tell if additional fetishes mentioned aren’t just an attempt to create an image of normality.
Furthermore most instances of vore material are not based on physical or realistic phenomena (like diapers for example), and just like the Willywonka Blueberry girl thing the fetish fringes on concepts that are highly cultural and contrived.
I can see and imagine more furry instances of vore fetishism occurring. Snakes for example need live prey to thrive, and consuming the live animal is some of the only excitement you will ever see from this otherwise dormant creature.
Lots of kids movies are centered around the vulnerability of small mammals were carnivorous creatures are made out to be villains, and any approachable spinoff of the carnivorous villian is probaly going to be the ‘light diner’ that likes to play with his food, and emotionally charged encounters with his prey could end in some kind of demented romance, or other excuse for the adorable animal to not be consumed in front of the target kids audience.
As for the actual consumption there appears to be two versions. Soft core and hard core vore. Soft core being the more popular one where the consumption is reduced to some non fatal organic copulation, and hard core vore being based on the raw reality of being chewed up and digested.
Understanding the difference between these two can help us understand the cognitive dissonance and pathologies that allow such a fetish to exist, and help us understand the fetish as a whole.
The fact the soft core version is more popular than the more realistic, emotionally charged counterpart can mean many things. In science if we want something to be true, we try to assume it’s not, so one assumption to consider is personal or interpersonal dishonesty being prevalent. There is much more to consider. The actual occurrence of death seems to be a roadblock in even the most demented pathologies. People explicitly into the dead might have mechanisms that keep them from fully realizing what death (or life) means.
The theme of death goes on to also separate balloon fetishism. For many people the popping of balloons is analog to the orgasm, but a lot of balloon fetishist equate this to the death of the balloon, and can even become emotionally distraught from balloon popping.
I’m coming back to this. Just going to eat and see what others have to add.