@I Was Never Here
I’m listening mate, at the very least. But you know you can engage with a topic without platforming it? I can read someones book / manifesto and produce a dissertation dissecting every single one of their points WITHOUT giving them a platform. You don’t need a Nazi in the flesh to be able to argue with a Nazi- you can just read Mein Kampf or review history and discuss it there. And sure…
No, you don’t understand. If you were to deplatform any Nazism as a whole then you can’t engage with it. You wouldn’t be able to read someone’s books or manifestos because there wouldn’t be a book or manifesto to read. Writing is a platform just like art, and it can be dented by publishers and distributors same as derpibooru can deny their platform to artists and other creators.
But for a dose of reality here- the only “site where you can’t post dissenting opinions” is literally Stormfront. This is the “locked down dissenting opinion” website we’re talking about.
As far as I’m concerned, that’s very much my point. I think the reason that sites like stormfront exist is because the people who discuss there have been pushed off of other platforms and have been forced to make their own, and because of that they have adopted the same policies that isolated them in the first place, thus worsening the whole of public discourse.
I mean sure on spreading it elsewhere, but there is definitely an effective result when it comes to deplatforming people and the volume of their voice / how far it can spread after the fact.
I disagree, as someone who has been watching this for years I would say that in a lot of cases deplatforming someone is more likely to ultimately spread their ideas faster, because there are always people who are going to want to know why it got deplatformed in the first place.
In essence I think that in most cases deplatforming is a flawed attempt to deny someone the franchise to speak, but more so it’s denying everyone else the franchise to hear them and make up their own minds about the situation. In the end, I think the most insidious voices aren’t even the ones that say that certain people’s voices shouldn’t be allowed to carry, I think the most insidious ones are the ones who say that nobody should have the right to think about what they have to say.