@☬ ᏝᏆᏁᏨᎾᏝᏁᏰᏒᎬᎳᏕᎿᎬᏒᎱᎯᏁ ☬
swirly markings probably should, although, it would need to get removed from a few pictures where there aren’t any coat markings, like >>1906972, >>2223022, >>2243866, etc.swirls definitely shouldn’t imply coat markings, it’s just for the shape in general.
swirls is probably more general than just the straight-up swirly markings.
robin hood hat is the better name of the two. But I’d wait for more/mod input beforehand.@☬ ᏝᏆᏁᏨᎾᏝᏁᏰᏒᎬᎳᏕᎿᎬᏒᎱᎯᏁ ☬
I think it’s neither and instead just a ‘Robin Hood hat’ (apparently named “bycocket”), just seen from the front. Would fit with the ‘sword and cape’ theme going on.I don’t think there’s a tag for it, but I’ve not checked all five pages under *hat*. Not sure there’s enough results to warrant a tag, even with Robin Hood’s (which apparently is used to actually mean the hat sometimes), but then again it’s not like it’d be easy to check how many uploads have this hat…If the tag needs to be made, I’d sayrobin hood hatis the better name of the two. But I’d wait for more/mod input beforehand.
A living being mostly in another or otherwise being eaten.
Nintendo 3ds (console) But does this contemplate its representation in drawings or does it also apply with photos? What 3ds model is it? I think console It is already more direct, you just need to filter well what you are looking for.Mario Paint also follow the same logic?
Should the tag Twilight Darkle be removed?All the other tags relating to puns based of the character being black have been deleted too
artist:xxxx seems too authoritative.
vibrating implies animated but routinely gets tagged on still images where a character is supposed to be vibrating (>>2903297 >>2862810) or a vibrator is being used vibrating + vibratorshaking, suddering or shivering/quivering instead? If vibrator should be used instead for all the latter, what do with images using improvised sex toys (>>2742099 Explicit) or other means of vibration (>>2478624 Questionable) instead of proper vibrators? Should vibrating be renamed to make it more clear it’s primarily for gifs?animated, vibrating has it written in its description that it’s for animated images only, too… (In some other cases tag implications are just because they’re forgotten too often, and it’s OK to remove them afterward.)
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!