Roseluck 
The part in parentheses is there because of pictures like this (which would be “hand on hip” but not “hands on hips”):
Again, if no distinction is made, maybe just point out in the description that the tag goes for both one or two hands on one or both hips.
hand on hip
Unless I’m the only one who separates the two when looking for art references. Hopefully the cleanup from making “hand on hip” distinct from “hands on hips” won’t be a nightmare. There’s one stepping stone for that at least; the tag hands on hip.
If no distinction is made, that tag should be aliased to hand on hip like the others.
As for the descriptions, something like this;
Unless I’m the only one who separates the two when looking for art references. Hopefully the cleanup from making “hand on hip” distinct from “hands on hips” won’t be a nightmare. There’s one stepping stone for that at least; the tag hands on hip.
If no distinction is made, that tag should be aliased to hand on hip like the others.
As for the descriptions, something like this;
hand on hip: A character with one hand on one hip (whether their own or another character’s). For a character with both hands on both hips, use [hands on hips] instead.
hands on hips: A character with both hands on both hips (whether their own or another character’s). For a character with only one hand on one hip, use [hand on hip] instead.
The part in parentheses is there because of pictures like this (which would be “hand on hip” but not “hands on hips”):
Again, if no distinction is made, maybe just point out in the description that the tag goes for both one or two hands on one or both hips.
