UnderwoodART 
Just Another Pink Pony
[the hub](/tags/the+hub) and [hub logo](/tags/hub+logo) appear to have the same content.
[hub network](/tags/hub+network) is also very similar, but appears to have some content relating to the channel without the literal logo.
My suggestion would be to have an umbrella "channel logo" tag (or something) that is implied by all 'logo' tags (netflix logo, discovery logo, hub logo, etc.), move all instances of tagging the hub logo to "hub logo", and leave "the hub" for logoless references (like >>2161511). "hub network" would also be split between logos and references (eg. >>767551). The channel references could be consolidated into a "channel reference" tag if the specifics are un't important, further defining them from the logos.
It will be tedious work (that I'm willing to do), but as it stands, the two tags are basically clones and all are messy.
[hub network](/tags/hub+network) is also very similar, but appears to have some content relating to the channel without the literal logo.
My suggestion would be to have an umbrella "channel logo" tag (or something) that is implied by all 'logo' tags (netflix logo, discovery logo, hub logo, etc.), move all instances of tagging the hub logo to "hub logo", and leave "the hub" for logoless references (like >>2161511). "hub network" would also be split between logos and references (eg. >>767551). The channel references could be consolidated into a "channel reference" tag if the specifics are
It will be tedious work (that I'm willing to do), but as it stands, the two tags are basically clones and all are messy.