@Zeb
That helps for some of them but there are situations where it’s not really subtle, the contact is just not shown for whatever reasons- be it positioning or covered by stuff.
Some of that strategically covered might cover but again not all:
“An otherwise explicitly nude character is covered by convenient obstructions, like sprawled mid-air ribbons or falling leaves. Seemingly of artist conscious obstructions. Use Covering instead if the character is actively covering their nudity.”
This one right here is a good example for that, there arguably is convenient obstruction of the penetration but I would see strategically covered more in situations where there might be a chair or whatoever object obstructing our view, not body parts?
Another random example >>863129 this is not so subtle either, and arguably not strategically covered, but we do not see mouth-pussy contact directly- so what should that be called?
(All that notwithstanding, would probably be more wise to open a discussion thread in the forum for that to maybe create a new tag for it?)
@Background Pony #6736 @Background Pony #350B
Well we do have Subtly explicit.
Which is for when the thing that makes the image explicit is extremely hard to notice. I believe that could apply to this. You can’t directly see what’s making it explicit, but you can tell it is.
@Background Pony #6736
It’s the same for me, I actually keep a list of many such uploads because I find that very appealing.
A tag for them would be great.
Explicit, but no genitals, but clearly they’re having sex right? Weird case.
@Zeb
I frequently wonder about that point Chaotic brought up, too
Is there any tag for that or could we make one?
Sex clearly happening in the picture but no genitals visible? That’s actually damn hot, at least to me, leaves something to the imagination although you know damn well what happens <3
On another note, I wasn’t “furious for days”. I made a statement and stuck with it. The artist made a various of the image, I thanked them and even uploaded it here with a link back to the source. I commended the artist and I closed out what I had to say on the subject.
@Daneasaur
Being that pissed for actual, literal days because people have a different interpretation of this one fanart than you do, and even after an alternate version had been made in response… wow. Just… wow.
Sometimes people will like things you don’t. Sometimes people will not like things you do. Sometimes if you hear them out on why, you’ll understand - and sometimes you still won’t, but it’ll be okay anyway.
In all seriousness, you should get some help, or sit down and rethink your life, or something. Life’s too short.
@Daneasaur
But why the scene pictured couldn’t be happening after Thorax and Ember met back up with Spike? Maybe even months after, when the couple decided to visit the place where it all began.
Thorax proved he could be playful and, after Ember’s pep talk, even assertive. In fact, he didn’t have problems with it while Ember nearly choked herself trying to get any words out to Spike later.
@Officer Hot-Pants
That’s the Splatterhouse mask. It’ll make ANYONE into a rage murder beast. That said, I think everyone here needs to take a chill pill. Everyone.
