@EricNeoMatrix
 
@JP  
Would you believe that the image number is 1707?

Holy shit this is 7 years old?

>Uploaded 7 years ago  
Has it been that long already?

@Havock  
Alright, I’ll see.

@TheSecondArrivalOfGod  
Unless…
 
 
They become human.

No magical horse can learn how to solve a rubiks cube.

@Nightweaver20xx  
Well it’s been theorized that there’s 11 dimensions, which is insane!

@Yet One More Idiot  
How many possible combinations does that have, and how long would it take to solve? Wait, 7-D? Can that even exist in normal space-time?

Try using Flex Seal ^tm Trixie.

I don’t like to play Rubik’s cube because it’s hard to play

@GrapefruitFace  

 
Don’t worry GrapefruitFace - it hurts everyone’s brain.
 
It hurt my brain just taking that screencap of it. :P

@Starry Mind  
That would probably be cheating.

@Yet One More Idiot  
That hurts my brain.

@sTs  
I laugh in the face of your Rubik Petaminx, and raise you a 7D, 5x5x5x5x5x5x5 Rubik Cube.
 

this confuses the little trixie.

The Tenacious and Persistent Trixie will not be defeated by a cube!

@sTs  
The goal is to give each side a different solid color, right?
 

@monolyth
 
@GrapefruitFace  
Also no swearing, sir. This is a Christian server. :p

@monolyth  
Don’t you dare insult Trixie. Bullies are not welcome here.

@sTs  
Those are not that hard per se. Once you understand the algorithms that are used for solving a type of puzzle it is really just a question of how long will it take you. Also if you turn well, sloppy turns and forgetting where you are in an algorithm are what kill a lot of solves.

Trxie is a dumb horse who can’t even solve the first layer

@OtherPonyName  
You think the rublk’s cube is Impossible?  
Well look at this!  
 
God himself can’t even figure it out.

Fake magic horse is sad.

@Master Fox
 
@sTs
 
Also usually Yellow is opposite white making that white/yellow edge piece impossible, though the sticker scheme could be different from standard. There are also more then 6 colors.

@GrapefruitFace  
Really, it’s that out of context?