Atlas_66 
"[@SMT5015":](/images/2699142#comment_9804249
[)
**Oppresses women and children
All rights are equal since 1918, free schools and universities for everyone*]
*
>Free schools were in the Russian Empire, general education was already there.
And those educational standards that were in the USSR were originally standards from the tsarist education. The Bolsheviks, even when they came to power, they abandoned the standard education and experimented, for example, with collectible assessments and with the prohibition of teaching history in the early days. Then they brought back the image of the tsarist education.
30s, when professors with imperial education taught at universities, and higher education in Russia was of very high quality, it is a pity, of course, that not everyone survived and there was repression.
And yes, nothing is never free, it's a cheap, pop-loving move. Moreover, education and universities can be built without gulags, without political repression and without borders closed for leaving.
[
**Kills innovation and initiative
Went mad with modernising everything, rewarded innovative workers*]
*
>Modernization and peaceful industrialization was back in the Russian Empire, forced industrialization and modernization can be done without communists in power, without driving people into collective farms, without mass extermination of people based on their class affiliation and physical destruction of political dissidents, without gulags, without collective farms, sub-appropriation.
All this can be done without political practice implying class struggle and the principle of collective responsibility; it turns out that these are not necessary conditions in order to carry out modernization and make innovative decisions.
Again, this was all still in the Russian Empire, and if it were not for the First World War and the subsequent upheavals, then Russia would have continued to develop even more actively.
[
**Destroys traditional culture
As if it is good by itself*]
*
>Yes, the Bolshevik government really destroyed massive cultural monuments and culture. Culturally, one religion was replaced by another religion, from the Orthodox faith to the Marxist faith.
When artists were forced to paint "socialist realism" and if in the Russian Empire an artist could display a picture with the poor, for example, in the USSR the censorship would not have allowed a picture where Soviet citizens were already living in poverty))
Culturally, it was powerful propaganda that even now there are people who can justify the atrocities of the Bolsheviks.
In general, you could not paint a picture or create any art that shows a revolution (illegal armed coup) from a negative position.
When artists were forced to paint "socialist realism" and if in the Russian Empire an artist could display a picture
[
**Spreading false propaganda
>Covering up its misdeeds
>Internal corruption
These reasons are valid for pretty much every regime ever though*]
*
>Yes, the USSR is not the only country that is sinning with this, in Nazi Germany there was no less corruption and even more internal chaos, there was also stupid propaganda, but what does other countries have to do with it when it comes to the Soviet regime.
Of course, in the United States there is corruption and propaganda in Britain, but we are not talking about these countries))
In general, I am not liberal) I have no complaints about propaganda or corruption, even the fact that the Soviet regime is not democracy, this totalitarianism, I have no complaints about this.
My main complaint is to the ideology itself, to the planned economy, state capitalism that was in the USSR and the destruction of the private market, and with closed borders, this gives rise to a black market and even more corruption.
ヽ(*・ω・)ﾉ
p.s. And at the expense of the picture itself with the inscription "Communism is evil?" I disagree with this, communism is not evil)) in general, the ideology itself sounds very nice on paper, and it easily draws uneducated people into their faith, but ... in practice, what comes out when building communism is already a separate question)
I do not treat communism as evil, for me it is like a Bible and a promise of paradise, the fact that people sit in the room and read Marxism, believe in a beautiful fairy tale about communism, I have no problems with this)) the main thing is that these people of radical left views did not get into real politics and did not go to the polls)
🍞
[
**Oppresses women and children
All rights are equal since 1918, free schools and universities for everyone*
>Free schools were in the Russian Empire, general education was already there.
And those educational standards that were in the USSR were originally standards from the tsarist education. The Bolsheviks, even when they came to power, they abandoned the standard education and experimented, for example, with collectible assessments and with the prohibition of teaching history in the early days. Then they brought back the image of the tsarist education.
30s, when professors with imperial education taught at universities, and higher education in Russia was of very high quality, it is a pity, of course, that not everyone survived and there was repression.
And yes, nothing is never free, it's a cheap, pop-loving move. Moreover, education and universities can be built without gulags, without political repression and without borders closed for leaving.
[
**Kills innovation and initiative
Went mad with modernising everything, rewarded innovative workers*
>Modernization and peaceful industrialization was back in the Russian Empire, forced industrialization and modernization can be done without communists in power, without driving people into collective farms, without mass extermination of people based on their class affiliation and physical destruction of political dissidents, without gulags, without collective farms, sub-appropriation.
All this can be done without political practice implying class struggle and the principle of collective responsibility; it turns out that these are not necessary conditions in order to carry out modernization and make innovative decisions.
Again, this was all still in the Russian Empire, and if it were not for the First World War and the subsequent upheavals, then Russia would have continued to develop even more actively.
[
**Destroys traditional culture
As if it is good by itself*
>Yes, the Bolshevik government really destroyed massive cultural monuments and culture. Culturally, one religion was replaced by another religion, from the Orthodox faith to the Marxist faith.
When artists were forced to paint "socialist realism" and if in the Russian Empire an artist could display a picture with the poor, for example, in the USSR the censorship would not have allowed a picture where Soviet citizens were already living in poverty))
Culturally, it was powerful propaganda that even now there are people who can justify the atrocities of the Bolsheviks.
In general, you could not paint a picture or create any art that shows a revolution (illegal armed coup) from a negative position.
When
[
**Spreading false propaganda
>Covering up its misdeeds
>Internal corruption
These reasons are valid for pretty much every regime ever though*
>Yes, the USSR is not the only country that is sinning with this, in Nazi Germany there was no less corruption and even more internal chaos, there was also stupid propaganda, but what does other countries have to do with it when it comes to the Soviet regime.
Of course, in the United States there is corruption and propaganda in Britain, but we are not talking about these countries))
In general, I am not liberal) I have no complaints about propaganda or corruption, even the fact that the Soviet regime is not democracy, this totalitarianism, I have no complaints about this.
My main complaint is to the ideology itself, to the planned economy, state capitalism that was in the USSR and the destruction of the private market, and with closed borders, this gives rise to a black market and even more corruption.
ヽ(*・ω・)ﾉ
p.s. And at the expense of the picture itself with the inscription "Communism is evil?" I disagree with this, communism is not evil)) in general, the ideology itself sounds very nice on paper, and it easily draws uneducated people into their faith, but ... in practice, what comes out when building communism is already a separate question)
I do not treat communism as evil, for me it is like a Bible and a promise of paradise, the fact that people sit in the room and read Marxism, believe in a beautiful fairy tale about communism, I have no problems with this)) the main thing is that these people of radical left views did not get into real politics and did not go to the polls)