@ColdhardSilver  
Y’all should maybe work a little harder on your PR department then, maybe not let the shitbaggiest of your group’s shitbags act as your representatives elsewhere on the internet. This fandom would universally look like a bunch of creepy assholes too if we always let people like Dragondicks and Chris-chan and hashtaggamergaters be our public face with absolutely none of us ever countering them with anything other than endless repetitions of #NotAllChanners.

@JustTheBast  
I’ll yield that my use of the word statistics was a mistake, but my point still stands.  
The 75% claim and his other implications about “channers” are rather off base generalizations, and I’m not even sure how one can even come up with a quantified conclusion all things considering.  
I mean many anons on image boards use the phrase “>X board is one person” in a mocking tone for a reason; the implication that all or even a majority of anons of certain boards or a board site like 4chan all follow the same mindset is silly, IMO.

@ColdhardSilver  
The whole point of statistics is that you don’t have to examine every single member of a group in detail, but can make reasonably accurate statements, based on a much smaller representative sample. Your implication that one would have to “meet every anon, new and old” in order to make such a statement is nonsensical.
 
To be clear, I personally have no idea whether TexasUberAlles is correct in his assessment - and his claim of actually having met all anons sounds ludicrous to me - but your claim that such an all-encompassing census is required is just as wrong.

@TexasUberAlles  
Well shit son, congrats on doing what initially seemed like a statistically impossibility.  

@ColdhardSilver  
Pretty sure, yeah.

@TexasUberAlles  
@Background Pony #A290  
“…Which is an attitude that exemplifies about 75% of channers”  
You sure about that?  
Can you say that is true beyond a shadow of a doubt?  
Have you somehow meet every anon, new and old, and have gotten an honest true answer behind their motives?  

@TexasUberAlles  
“…Which is an attitude that exemplifies about 75% of channers, who use “SJW” as a stand in for “anyone who is sick of our racism and sexism and assholishness in general and won’t let us get away with being assholes without commenting on it”.”
 
This

@Background Pony #5A88  
Not even close, bro. Try harder.

@TexasUberAlles  
Lets combat racism and sexism and assholishness in general…with our own racism and sexism and assholishness.
 
In general.

@TexasUberAlles  
Oooh, my bad. I missed the context and didn’t understand what you meant.

@a6p  

Here’s what it would look like if you swapped out “toxic” with “SJW”:

…Which is an attitude that exemplifies about 75% of channers, who use “SJW” as a stand in for “anyone who is sick of our racism and sexism and assholishness in general and won’t let us get away with being assholes without commenting on it”.

@TexasUberAlles  
Wat  
I’m pretty sure most channers are not sjw, considering people on 4chan are some of the least PC people on the internet.  
Maybe you meant tumblr users?

@JustTheBast  
That’s because people cant do constructive criticism anymore.Now,it’s either blind praise or treating soemone like he/she was less than trash.Internet killed the middle ground

@JustTheBast  
You could swap out “toxic” with “SJW” and pretty much have tagged about 75% of channers all at once.

Of course, some people define “toxic” as “anyone who won’t agree with my bullshit and play cheerleader to the way I fuck up my life and the lives of those around me,” or like the author of the picture calls it, “someone makes you feel bad about yourself.”

@Datte-Before-Dawn  
That’s the spirit.

@TexasUberAlles  
You’re right friend, you’re far to superior for my measly brain!  
Enjoy being right on the internet ;o

@Datte-Before-Dawn  
Your is holding something, bro, but it ain’t water.
 
How many subreddits are there talking about the similarities between MRA ideology and KKK ideology, or the similarities between hashtaggamergater ideology and Daesh ideology, or the similarities between Reddit and NAMBLA? I’d ask if you see how this works, but I think it’s pretty clear you are never going to do that.

What the-  
Wasn’t this post deleted as “spam” or something? O.o

@Datte-Before-Dawn  
We know that it’s popular to compare certain opinions to the Holocaust, just like it’s popular to compare them to any number of “evil” things that have no meaningful resemblance to them beyond being evil in ways the hated opinions aren’t. It’s just not a convincing claim, unless you already hate them enough to make claims like that convincing.

@OverlordScorpion  

 
Anyone else hearing the Brittney Spears song right about now?

@Background Pony #EB63  
Considering that there’s an entre subreddit dedicated to the eerie similarities to both SJW and Nazi ideology, I’m sure my half-joke holds some water
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/StormfrontorSJW/comments/2l4zq8/nazi_or_sjw/

I honestly and genuinely agree with many of these so I watch the tag and fave these instead of filtering.

…And thanks to both Tumblr’s handy new “functional blocking feature” and Derpibooru’s rarely-used “Filters”, there ain’t really any valid excuse for The Usual Suspects to not cut stuff like this out of their lives.
 
LET’S SEE HOW WELL THAT WORKS!

@Obsessive Rarity Fan  
Well not always.  
The most positive intent of the phrase to help people who are friends with rather dangerous and negative influences like hoodlums and addicts leave such people before said person’s actions spill over to them.