@ShimmeringStallion
Personally, I don’t even see why the tag “implied incest” is tagged to this image. The image itself does not imply in anyway, shape, or form that there is any incest that is has happened, is happening, or is going to happen. Now with outside sources, it is easy to infer that incest is implied, but outside sources are not the picture, and the tags are only meant to describe the image, not stuff that isn’t in the image.
@ShimmeringStallion
the more i see your comments, the more i start to think you majored in english, and are now and an english professor at some studios college! at the age of 25!
@Toxicpinkiepie
That’s a double-negative, so it’s the same as if you replaced “isn’t” with “is”, and removed “not”. You only need ONE negative added to the sentence.
@Kirb
It was heavily implied that when the tape snapped off of pinkie’s tits, it hit maud in the eye.
Yes, technically incest.
No, not blind, just bandaged.
No, not permanent, just until it heals.