Anthro foalcon

Site and Policy » Anthro foalcon Search Posts
EyeGuy
Duck - quack
Fine Arts - Two hundred uploads with a score of over a hundred (Safe/Suggestive)

Dreading Season 9
One of the site’s rules is:
 
Do not upload artwork of characters in a sexualized depiction, or in sexual scenarios, who look underage and look human or human-like. (There was a previous part about the earlier anthro foalcon images being grandfathered, but it seems to have been removed.
 
If that’s the case, then why hasn’t this image been removed? Moderator Derpy Whooves told me to bring it up in the forum, which is what I’m doing.
Princess Luna
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Thread Starter - Started a thread with over 100 pages
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Notoriously Divine Tagger - Consistently uploads images above and beyond the minimum tag requirements. And/or additionally, bringing over the original description from the source if the image has one. Does NOT apply to the uploader adding several to a dozen tags after originally uploading with minimum to bare tagging.
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Economist -
A Perfectly Normal Pony - <%Nebulon> Yeah, just fetch me a smaller anus, sweetie.
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
From the Night -

Senior Moderator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
@EyeGuy  
Sexualized depiction is rather vague, but basically, it doesn’t include accidentally showing someone your underwear (provided your underwear isn’t particularly revealing); the image should probably be rated safe, but even at suggestive, it definitely isn’t what any actual country cares about as far as lolicon.
Derpy Whooves
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Artist -
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Artistic Detective - For awesome dedication to sleuthing out and maintaining artist tags and links
Economist -
Not a Llama - Happy April Fools Day!

Looking For My Doctor
You have a very odd interpretation of what “sexualized” means. Yes, it’s anthro, but it’s not foalcon or lolicon.
 
Others might disagree with me about this, but the only reason it’s tagged “suggestive” instead of “safe” is because there’s a “presenting” or upskirt fetish involved, and even that might be arguable.
 
At worse the image is not as revealing as a swimsuit image, and it’s certainly more tame that something that was even ok for general audiences through most of the last century:
 
full
 
If the image disturbs you, please filter it.
 
If you think for some reason that the image should be tagged as “Foalcon” or “lolicon”, please make that case.
 
@Princess Luna  
Sorry, our replies crossed in the streams. But I agree - if that were tagged “Safe” I wouldn’t bat an eye. And I’m a massive prude.
EyeGuy
Duck - quack
Fine Arts - Two hundred uploads with a score of over a hundred (Safe/Suggestive)

Dreading Season 9
So, what about Tolpain’s other artwork? What is allowed here and what isn’t?
 
I’m guessing the drawings of the characters showing you their panties on purpose while blushing with hearts would be considered sexual, but what about this and this? I remember them getting removed when I tried posting them.
Princess Luna
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Thread Starter - Started a thread with over 100 pages
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Notoriously Divine Tagger - Consistently uploads images above and beyond the minimum tag requirements. And/or additionally, bringing over the original description from the source if the image has one. Does NOT apply to the uploader adding several to a dozen tags after originally uploading with minimum to bare tagging.
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Economist -
A Perfectly Normal Pony - <%Nebulon> Yeah, just fetch me a smaller anus, sweetie.
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
From the Night -

Senior Moderator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
@EyeGuy  
Once they’re basically presenting, it gets into problematic waters. There isn’t an easy way to describe what is and isn’t allowed, it’s generally best to set up asking us in private whether something’s allowed.  
Also, be careful linking to that stuff here; InkBunny links require logging in and all that and the last two are pretty tame, but something like an imgur link with that first one’s definitely content wouldn’t be okay.
Background Pony #AB81
what is the difference between this pic here (NSFW pictures coming)  
>>1720355  
and this one here?  
https://inkbunny.net/s/1630023
 
why did you remove anibaru’s pic and why can that diamond tiara’s pic stay here, which has even more humanlike features and look clearly underaged.
Background Pony #AB81
@Princess Luna  
I dont care. And neither do the mods in many cases. And here is so problem again. Sometimes the pics get judged by the looks and sometimes streight what the sources tags say. That is so stupid. I asked what the differences are. Just look at both pics without any tags. And tell me that the diamond tiara pic is less loli that animaruthecats picture.
Derpy Whooves
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Artist -
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Artistic Detective - For awesome dedication to sleuthing out and maintaining artist tags and links
Economist -
Not a Llama - Happy April Fools Day!

Looking For My Doctor
@Background Pony #B13B  
Based on some of your other comments on the site you seem to think all the moderators act unilaterally and we all just do whatever we want - but that isn’t how this site works. Whenever an image is reported for #5, whether it’s reported by someone on staff or a user, any staff members logged in look at the image and if they have an opinion are welcomed to weigh in on the review. Sometimes those reviews go for a few hours or longer. We’re workings as a team here, not as a bunch of renegade cowboys as you seem to think - so here’s your second opinion: yes, that’s what the team decided about that image.
Background Pony #AB81
@Derpy Whooves  
I cant believe that a whole group of you think that diamone tiara looks anything else than loli. But anibaruthecat pic is. Just by comparing those two should make it obvious that diamond tiara is more loli thab flutters and her brother.
Background Pony #AB81
@Derpy Whooves  
Oh and there are mods who do whatever they want as it seems. Not too long ago i reported a pic for beeing loli which was given the older tag by a mod. Soon after it got removed. Doesnt speak for a group decisions here. And when a pic just gets removed after only a few minutes, doesnt reflect a group decision either. Sooo yeah.
Derpy Whooves
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Artist -
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Artistic Detective - For awesome dedication to sleuthing out and maintaining artist tags and links
Economist -
Not a Llama - Happy April Fools Day!

Looking For My Doctor
@Background Pony #B13B  
For some images, it doesn’t take long to get a unanimous “Get that the FUCK off the site”.
 
Not too long ago i reported a pic for beeing loli which was given the older tag by a mod
 
If it hadn’t been reported for Rule #5, then why would we have done a Rule #5 review of it? If that was me who added the “Older”, and staff later decided it was Rule #5, then that’s fine. There have been images that I added the “Older” tag to, and then asked for a review of, just to be safe - so that mod that added that tag, and as a part of the review agreed it should go, might have been me.
 
I honestly do not understand why you have a problem with that.
Blossomforth
Thread Starter - Started a thread with over 100 pages
Flexible - Bendy Pony

The Flexible One
I reviewed your report history, and out of thirteen images you’ve reported for Rule #5, it looks like eleven of them have been deleted for Rule #5. I certainly appreciate you reporting such images, and it appears that your reports are pretty accurate most of the time. However, that doesn’t mean that we’re gonna agree with your assessment 100% of the time, nor does it mean that the site’s moderators are doing whatever they want.
 
If an image is tagged both “anthro” and “foalcon” by the artist, either on this site or at the source, it’s an instant deletion - no questions asked, no further evaluation. If the artist says it’s anthro foalcon, that trumps everything else and the image is deleted from Derpibooru. That’s why Anibaru’s picture was removed - he tagged it as such at the source, so it’s not allowed here.
 
As for the Diamond Tiara image in question - I’m not in a place where I can be reviewing NSFW images at the moment, but we’re generally on the “better safe than sorry” side of things when it comes to Rule #5, and typically tend to delete more than we allow, so if multiple moderators are saying it’s fine, it’s probably ok. I’ll review it later when I have a better chance to.
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Ponies Online! - April 13-14

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide