Feature suggestions and discussion [READ THE FIRST POST]

@Joey  
Lots of people put whatever stream/video (usually stream) they screencapped it from as the source.

@Joey  
those could be dismissed, maybe? they can at least be found under ‘screencap’, or similar tags.
 
at least that’s the kind of workaround I was thinking for situations in which you want to find actual sourceless images.

@Joey  
Yeah, that’s a point, I’m just trying to think of a way to get all of the images that probably do have sources– but weren’t posted with one– tagged as such, and uploaders sure as heck haven’t been steppin’ up and doing it themselves lately.

@TexasUberAlles  
If you just want images that have no source at all, search operators can be left blank

@Joey  
 
…Sssssomethin’ ain’t right there; the most recent image listed with the filter set to Everything is from five months ago.

@Joey  
@TexasUberAlles  
That the correct search would be this.
 
With a tiny bit of refinement, this. By an large seems to be poorly tagged memes/image macros, edits with the source in the description or comments sometimes, art from artists unaware of the “derpibooru exclusive” tag, posted here at the same time as their other site(s), or that don’t even tag themselves, stuff from chan drawthreads, and older PB-days art that didn’t have a source then and no one ever found one since.

@The Smiling Pony  

Picarto livestreams are supported again. They finally gave us an API to work with.

@liamwhite1  
YES

@liamwhite1  

@liamwhite1  
Yay! :D

@liamwhite1  

Commonly forgotten tags quick-menu inclusions  
Safe: pony, hooves [where the shape of the hoof is clearly visible, like in >>1106735, >>1091207 and >>1104434, where the hoof is more clearly defined, and not like >>1094613, >>1122875, >>1126346, >>1140311, {>>1138239 >>1115768 although these particular images wouldn’t normally classify, they would be exceptions, as they discusses hooves) The reason behind it being because it would be a grossly saturated tag, and there’s no tag for the more “hoof-like/classic horseshoe shaped hoof” images], frog (hoof), spread legs, human coloration, solo focus
 
Above safe: solo male, solo female, solo futa, labia, nipples, areola, puffy areola, clitoris, erect nipples, erection, erect, dark genitals, horsecock
 
I’m sure I’m forgetting a number of them that I had a day or so ago.

@Brokedownandmadeone  
Isn’t erect used for the same thing as erection?

@Brokedownandmadeone  
Antisuggesting “pony” in particular because that is a worthless-ass tag that isn’t ‘forgotten’, its ‘absurdly redundant’ because either its assumed that a pony is, in fact, a pony, or if its not normally a pony, then its ‘ponified’.  
But pretty much all of those suggestions on that line except ‘solo focus’ are you projecting your fetishes as being common enough to need quick-tagging. Maybe human coloration, maybe spread legs. Likewise for the explicit items; ‘solo x’ yes, specific stuff like ‘puffy areola’, no.

@Keith Mowz  
absurdly redundant  
Yeah, the existence of the no pony tag is the clearest indication that pony is considered the default content of any image uploaded here; what we really need is a reminder to include no pony on images that don’t feature or mention Ponies.

@Keith Mowz  
i mean personally i would like a way to search for ponies and just ponies without having to specifically exclude the god knows how many other species there are but it would be wayyyy too hard to not only enforce this for new images but to tag the hundreds of thousands of other already-existing images that would need the tag

@Brokedownandmadeone  
trust me, solo male is rarely forgotten. :v

I should’ve written it “Commonly forgotten/frequently used tags quick-menu inclusions”
 
@Solitude  
I have no idea. But both tags were there with different counts, and after checking, I just changed the few images tagged with erect changed over to erection.
 
@Keith Mowz  
For the pony thing, see @SuperSupermario24. Sums up the reason to have it re-focused on. Just because it’s “assumed”, doesn’t make it any easier to search for certain images. You know, the whole point of tags? Including, but not limited to: screencaps, solo images where the pony is featured, any group images with ponies doing stuff, any sexual situation; without adding several exemptions or excluding images where a pony may be present, but other species happen to be in the picture. This @TexasUberAlles only fixes part of the problem. But if you want to search images with ponies in them without adding several exemptions, or excluding images missing the no pony tag, it’s not so easy. Even with the no pony tag added to the proper images, it’s somewhat counter-intuitive to go “-no pony” when you could instead just type “pony”. And it’s definitely not convenient.  
As for the rest of the tags listed, you may not realize how many images are missing said tags.
 
hooves using the examples listed @Brokedownandmadeone, both over and under tagged. Reason with examples already posted -> “[where the shape of the hoof is clearly visible, like in >>1106735, >>1091207 and >>1104434, where the hoof is more clearly defined, and not like >>1094613, >>1122875, >>1126346, >>1140311, {>>1138239 >>1115768 although these particular images wouldn’t normally classify, they would be exceptions, as they discusses hooves) The reason behind it being because it would be a grossly saturated tag, and there’s no tag for the more “hoof-like/classic horseshoe shaped hoof” images]” Addendum: Also because any image with a pony in it would technically count as having hooves in it. Another possible usage of the tag could be for non-pony images in which the hooves are not show-like.
 
frog (hoof) (under tagged) Where the frog is more clearly defined
 
human coloration (lesser known) I didn’t even know this tag existed when I wanted to tag an image with it (even after thinking it wasn’t a tag when I began to type “normal” for “normal skin coloring”), until I saw it on another image much later.
 
spread legs (under tagged) This would also apply to safe-rated images, which I doubt gets tagged.
 
nipples, clitoris, erect nipples ^$, erection ^$, (and as someone else pointed out in another thread, which reminded me of others) mare, stallion, male, female, plantigrade anthro, unguligrade anthro, anthro (unless this one already gets implied by the previous two), semi-anthro, Obvious helpful above-safe quick-tags.  
^$ not all that sure why we have these tags, as nipples and penises tend to be considered erect anyway. Not sure we’ve come across an image where the nipple would be considered not erect, and we have the flaccid tag for the penis. Unless erect nipples is intended to be for nipples that show through clothing.
 
areola (under tagged) The area around the nipple where it’s at least noticeably included. Don’t ask me if the majority of images have areola, making the tag somewhat useless, because I don’t know.
 
labia (under tagged) Labia is for any female genitals (any species), where labia are present. Not all of them have that part present. Unless someone isn’t familiar with human anatomy (or just isn’t educated about human genitals, thanks ‘murrica! _{I live in the USA. The lack of fully informed sex ed is shamefur. Unless it was changed since I graduated.}), people that tag images should know what that part is, and tag appropriately. There are people who do or don’t want to see images with labia in it (hence, the already existing tag), so it should be tagged when necessary. In case one doesn’t know, see https://en.wikipedia.org
 
puffy areola (under tagged) applies to any images where the areola are more noticeably “raised” off the breast, which is under-tagged.
 
And no. This isn’t about “my fetishes”. This is about getting undertagged tags used as they were meant to be, and other somewhat non-obvious tags (“frog (hoof)” and “human coloration”) more attention.
 
Any discussion of how tags should be implemented/used/defined should be directed here -> Tag Discussion

New sort method: “Original upload date”. Sorts by date of upload of merged forward images: by earliest date of array of duplicates/merges.
 
For example:  
W X Y Z
 
Y merged to W
 
Sort by date:  
W X Z
 
Sort by original date (new):  
X W Z

@Background Pony #1551  
If there’s a way to implement that, I’d vote for this if only to make sure no dupes end up replacing slots on 3day and whatnot top lists by replacing the “uploaded date” with the one it was merged into. Or having it check the “original uploaded date” while still keeping the “new uploaded date” beside it. In both cases keeping the new upload >>####.

@Brokedownandmadeone  
Eh, I’m not talking about replacing it, I’m talking about adding it, like they added “random” sorting. (Also, if you want, you can replace your old image with updated version without any merges if you contact mods even now)

How about the ability for there to be multiple sources on an image? Either have an unlimited number (textbox with one source per line), or just add 2-3 additional source URL boxes?
 
It’d be highly beneficial for artists who post their art in multiple locations (DA/Tumblr/IB/FA), but don’t have a verified account on Derpibooru linking all those pages. Since uploaders don’t always know of/list alternative sources for an image in the description, and description editing is locked to the uploader, it kinda makes it hard to advertise other places to find the artist’s other works. Having multiple sources, where anyone can edit them, would make it a lot easier.

@Background Pony #1551  
Exists, but isn’t user visible (and I am frightened by merge conflicts from a year old feature branch, otherwise I would make this happen)

Minor issue but would help it stand out: in the dupe report interface, change “better” diffs from green to blue highlight.
 
Worse: red  
Same: green  
Different: yellow  
Better: blue