Feature suggestions and discussion [READ THE FIRST POST]

@byte[]  
Sorry for ask, but your profile didn’t use to have a billion badges? It just looks weird for some reason now

@byte[]  
Thanks.

It’s probably been mentioned before– I only noticed it yesterday because I usually upload things by tagging first– but it’s a neat feature that the Fetch from a DA page automagically adds an artist: tag.
 
@byte[]  
it is now actually possible to paginate notifications (previously it was not due to the idiotic way it was stored) and second, because I removed the upper bound on how many notifications you may have  
Good call on making sure you did the first before doing the second.

Paginated notifications are an improvement because now I don’t have to worry about losing notifications when the count is above 100.

@Derpy Whooves  
So what’s happening with this bug?

@wumbl3
 
Bugs of this nature can sometimes take a long time to figure out.

 
I hate to post this again, but are you guys gonna do this or not? I think I posted my first reply at a bad time.

@Moonatik  
Probably not until we can figure out whether or not we want to put explicit and related tags in the quick tag box.

@byte[]  
I know this would end up being way more complicated than it sounds, but what about a “related” tag thing in addition to the static quick tag box? That is, it takes the tags already entered (rating, etc) and returns a short list/cloud of tags commonly tagged with them. Could be something similar to whatever query is powering the related image search?
 
Actually, that could be a useful addition to the Tags page search, too.

@WingbeatPony  
Or as a separate page in the dropdown. Not sure why I couldn’t edit that post to add that.

@byte[]  
This isn’t about the quick tag box, though. The tag guidelines page already contains explicit and related tags, including things like futa and solo female, so adding foalcon to the “You will likely be banned for repeatedly not tagging these” list on that page doesn’t seem like a big problem.

Should we or should it be possible to have a search option that prioritizes content by what has the most or least amount of our watched tags within it? It seems like if this were there, then content that holds a lot of our interests would be easier to find.
 
Should we be able to approve or disapprove of tags if we are watchers of those tags? It could show how much of the displayed content holds what is valued about that tag based on its community approval. Those that are a part of the communities of those tags could make for decent judges of the tags’ quality.
 
Should we or should it be possible to see how much another user relates to us based on all the tags we are a part of with a percentage/score based system or something like it? I can see it providing two points for if you both watch the same tags, taking away points if one watches what the other hides, and for spoilers, it would add two points if you both have the same tag marked as spoiler, adds one point if one watches with the other having it as a spoiler, and take away one point if one has it marked as a spoiler and the other has it hidden. If you and the other are not either watching or have something marked as hidden or spoiler that shows alignment or conflict, then zero points will be given. And I can see a ranks being seen for those that score very close to your complete watch, spoiler, and hidden pool just to highlight those of common interest. I can see this being useful for finding those with common interests to share more interests with or even potentially being used as a filter for comments or content posting if possible. It would be nice to see how high a person scores, having a ranking convention of about five levels (something akin to Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum, and Diamond), and a percentage if that is not too much (perhaps score and percent could be seen with a hover over).

How about private galleries?

@gexon_pane  
^

i’d like to see recommended tags based on the tags you’ve already put in, like e621 has.

@mav  
There’s a userscript for that, really handy

@Sff  
it never seems to work for me

@mav  
Recently I’ve had to enter one tag before the suggestions load, and even then sometimes I might have to refresh the page. Also did you make sure you’re using St@SyaN’s updated version of it?

What do you folks think of adding the ability to allow users to view forum thread statistics(such as the 3 of posters and images currently present) if they wish to? How about it?

Is there a way to see how many times I’ve added or removed certain tags? I can see all of my tag additions/removals, but there’s no way to filter, search or count items on that list.

@JP  
ooh, i’d like to see this as well

EDIT: I think you were trying to re-consolidate two distinct informations: the image itself, and the uploader. I think this does not account for UI and UX concerns I describe below; additionally my understanding of description seems to not match yours - mine is “a short text describing the image”, yours seems to be “a comment by uploader on the image”.
 
This is not better grouping of information, this is worse grouping of information. Very important information (uploader, timestamp) now requires scrolling down instead of being immediately visible on page load.  
And there is a very large area of nothing on the favbar on my, and others’, screen resolution, because some buttons have to occupy now-vacant second row.  
Additionally “description is a comment” thing leaves a lot of space on the right unused due to being width-limited.  
Please reconsider.  
Additionally the down-arrow after “Description” looks like interactive element, but isn’t.
 
P.S. The static info in the header breaks down the flow of interactive elements. It should be placed after all interactive elements, not in the middle of them. All in all, I think that this change is strictly inferior to previous relevant UI.  
P.P.S. If this is caused by Badumsquish issue (UI cannot handle amount of badges) I suggest a more moderate fix of adding an UI element that, when clicked, displays the rest of the badges if amount of badges goes over the width of the header (=would increase it to 3 lines instead of 2).

I’m pretty indifferent to the image UI change. It feels a little more compact, though the upload info being moved down feels odd. I agree with @Barhandar though about the “Description” arrow and the resolution info looking out-of-place in its current spot in the header.  
EDIT: Also, the new placing of the uploader info looks worse on images where the uploader has a ton of badges (ie. Badumsquish).

@Barhandar  
Regarding “Very important information” - are you thinking of this in terms of watching for DNP uploads? Or is there another reason you find that information more important than the image itself?

@Barhandar  
For some reason I can’t edit my post again, so I’ll reply directly. I didn’t see your edit about badges when I edited my post. That would be a good fix, because excessive amounts of badges look worse with the new UI than the old one.