@Twitter-Mites
I’m perfectly happy without a religious lifestyle. I don’t need to follow some being I can’t see to be happy.
I’ve abandoned any interest in religion.
@RainbowDash69
All I’m reading here is “We don’t know why, so it has to be God”. It used to be gods that controlled the natural processes on Earth until we figured our the science behind it. All because we can’t explain it now doesn’t mean there isn’t an explanation for something that doesn’t involve a deity.
@Silent Wing
eh, this isn’t the right place. I’m sure a mod will tell us to “take it to the forums” or whatever. (read the rules!) You could do your own research, but I will do a little start right here.
Do you study philosophy at all? if so, you should know something about causality. for something to exist, it needs a cause. but how far do we go with causality? God is the uncaused first cause. A “first cause” is necessary because something cannot possibly be formed from nothing. Science cannot give any reasoning into the “big bang theory” and the logic to support it is quite flawed.
Atheists (especially new-age atheists) fail to disprove the existence of God because they focus on pointing out every flaw in religion. Of course religion is flawed, humans aren’t perfect. For atheists to disprove God, they need to pretend God isn’t omnipotent, omnipresent, and benevolent. They make up a secondary God that isn’t really God. As a Catholic, I know God is all-powerful. How could he not be? I mean, if a being created the universe, He would obviously need to be omnipotent.
