Read the text on the image, dude; get someone to help you with the big words if you need to. All of your artistic screeching could have been solved if you people had just taken your own advice and either used the tags or just gone somewhere else, and the fact that so many of you are still here whining about it instead of joining your fellow travelers over at Ponazybooru or whatever really puts your actually motivation front and center.

@TexasUberAlles  
Liking edgy art makes you racist?  
That’s a new low, even for you. XD  
Besides nothing is forcing you to be here among the “racists”. You can always go to furbooru, where is your place.

@Woodcut  
Complaining about what?  
A lot of people who like shitty racist images have been screaming very loudly over the last few weeks about Derpibooru making a new policy prohibiting shitty racist images, and even though a bunch of other MLP image boorus have sprung up specifically to cater to shitty racist images, many of those screaming racists have decided to stay here and screech about it instead of just going to one of those other shitty racist image boorus and letting the normal people stay here in peace.

Complaining about what?
 
And why that’s a reaction image?

@Officer Hotpants  

@Background Pony #3CA0  
He doesn’t limit himself to any particular situation.

@Background Pony #3CA0  

@Shimauma  
 
Did you just “criticism is harassment” post.  
I’ll point out that Lupa is subsidized by the biggest news company in São Paulo and they employ adults who are legally responsible for their claims, their job is quite literally to “dismantle fake news” but they crack under any pressure. They where under very rigorous expectations and they failed to uphold their worth. Look at the cycle:  

This same cycle of lies will repeat with the fake nazi bronies article. It’s just a matter of time until the self citing cycle becomes untraceable. We can end this by stop pretending.

@Dsiak  
The very first source is the Media Bias/Fact Check “about us” page. That sloppiness makes me doubt you’re any king of authority to judge whether targeted harassment is just someone being “”“put under scrutiny.”””

@Shimauma  
The very first source of that wikipage is an opinion piece where the author talks about Agencia Lupa, A Brazilian “”“fact checker””” “”“attacked””” in Brazil.  
First of all no one was attacked, they where put into scrutiny and accused of having bias, so the “”“attacked””” claim is already a lie. And most importantly the Agencia Lupa is lobbying with lawmakers to pass a “anti fake news” law while half of their fact checking is less than subpar and half of their posts is just “”“news””” pushing an idea. I’m Brazilian by the way.  
So no, that wiki article is not reliable, and there was no attention paid to sources. There was a lot of pretending that sources where read, but like always they don’t last an ounce of scrutiny.  
 
Wikipedia is so broken I could use the “end of the booru” article to add a section about nazi bronies on wikipedia, and them the toast zebra boi would use the wikipedia to boaster his claims, all the while the source for his claims is himself, because the original article only interviewed him. You see the problem here?

 
You mean as Texas used it, with attention paid to sourcing.

@Dsiak  
Hang on. Allow me to throw my hat in the ring.
 
I am uncertain if there is any information to be had in some of these links, but… fuck it.
 
First and foremost, Wikipedia’s reliability and credibility fall well short of the standards for a school paper. According to Wikipedia itself, “[W]hile some articles are of the highest quality of scholarship, others are admittedly complete rubbish. … use [Wikipedia] with an informed understanding of what it is and what it isn’t.”
 
In March 2009, Irish student Shane Fitzgerald, who was conducting research on the Internet and globalization of information, posted a fake quotation on the Wikipedia article about recently deceased French composer Maurice Jarre. Due to the fact that the quote was not attributed to a reliable source, it was removed several times by editors, but Fitzgerald continued reposting it until it was allowed to remain. Fitzgerald was startled to learn that several major newspapers picked up the quote and published it in obituaries, confirming his suspicions of the questionable ways in which journalists use websites, and Wikipedia, as a reliable source. Fitzgerald emailed the newspapers letting them know that the quote was fabricated; he believes that otherwise, they might never have found out.
 
Admins on Wikipedia also have the power to delete or disallow comments or articles they disagree with and support the viewpoints they approve. For example, beginning in 2003, U.K. scientist William Connolley became a website admin and subsequently wrote or rewrote more than 5,000 Wikipedia articles supporting the concept of climate change and global warming. More importantly, he used his authority to ban more than 2,000 contributors with opposing viewpoints from making further contributions. According to The Financial Post, when Connolley was through editing, “The Medieval Warm Period disappeared, as did criticism of the global warming orthodoxy.” Connolley has since been stripped of authority at Wikipedia, but one blogger believes he continues to post.
 
Furthermore, in 2007, a new program called WikiScanner uncovered individuals with a clear conflict of interest that had written or edited some Wikipedia entries. Employees from organizations such as the CIA, the Democratic National Party and Diebold were editing Wikipedia entries in their employers’ favor.
 
Another example, John Seigenthaler, a former assistant to Robert Kennedy, was falsely implicated in the assassinations of the Kennedy brothers on his Wikipedia biography for a period of more than 100 days without his knowledge.
 
And remember when the Taliban kidnapped New York Times reporter David Rohde in Afghanistan? The paper convinced 40 media organizations plus Wikipedia not to report on it out of concerns that it would compromise Rohde’s safety. Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales told the Times, once Rohde was free, that “We were really helped by the fact that it (postings on Rohde) hadn’t appeared in a place we would regard as a reliable source.” Thus, Wales and other senior Wikipedia editors showed they were willing to rely on the “unreliable source” canard to delete information they had been told by a very reliable source was true, even when a more noble reason—Rohde’s safety—would have justified it.
 
But the number one reason you can’t cite or rely on Wikipedia?
 
It says so on Wikipedia.
 
Wikipedia says, ‘‘We do not expect you to trust us’’. It adds that it is “not a primary source” and that “because some articles may contain errors,” you should “not use Wikipedia to make critical decisions.”
 
Furthermore, as Wikipedia notes in its About section, “Users should be aware that not all articles are of encyclopedic quality from the start: they may contain false or debatable information.”
 
Nevertheless, Wikipedia can actually be a constructive tool in the classroom… if understood and used correctly.
 
And while we’re at it…
 
@TexasUberAlles  
Bro there’s no room on the bandwagon for me and the 24 bans I’ve had over the last sevenish years for yelling at people like you.  
Hmm. Sometimes when you give replies like this, you learn more than you was hoping for, and I reckon that ain’t always the best thing. But I guess maybe it explains your duck badge.

It is not an argument if one is clearly right and the other is clearly wrong. But whatever makes you happy, pal.
 
Alright, buddy. I gotta run out for a bit. You behave while I’m gone.

@TexasUberAlles  
Wikipedia is not real source. I can personally point out a trolling I found years and years ago here
 
It clains that “Vertical Area Network” (VAN) is a topology to align modems and server points in a vertical manner to work in tall buildings, and the source is the leading book in computer network by Tenenbaum. This of course is non-sense bullshit. I even had the pleasure of meeting a wikipedia ADM in a free software conference and point it out for him. Funniest thing happened: he googled the fake information. and the fake information appears in many trash websites that copied directly from wikipedia. This of course is the well known phenomenon of self citation. And wikipedia is notorious for those. This is why real encyclopedias are peer reviewed instead of allowing any stinky brainer to edit using stinky journalists has sources.
 
Not gonna lie Texas, I love your art. That Chryss was great. But you are either being intellectually disingenuous by wikipediaposting or you are as gullible has a child. Either case I lost hope.

@GasMaskGuy98  
Bro there’s no room on the bandwagon for me and the 24 bans I’ve had over the last sevenish years for yelling at people like you.
 
Also LOL at thinking “this site which has extensive footnotes citing the sources of any factual claims doesn’t count as a source ” is a valid argument rather than self-identifying as someone who hasn’t mastered the fine art of “scrolling all the way down”.

@Dsiak  
@HumanoSiniestro  
Sorry for the delay, I was engaged in more pressing matters.
 
Let’s get this shit over with.
 
@TexasUberAlles  
It’s kinda sad that I apparently live in your head rent free when I don’t care enough who you are to bother following that Derpi link to see what you’re on about  
But at the same time you care enough to reply? Riiiiight… now tell me about the one were Santa Claus shot JFK.
 
And… dude, the number of times we’ve interacted as of writing this can ten to one be counted on one hand. Stop trying to clutch at straws.
 
but it wraps back around to knee-slappin’ hi-larious that your attempt at a five alarm sickburn or whatever is based around uncritically swallowing whatever MBFC spits out.  

Oh, yeah, ‘cause doing the same thing with Wikipedia is gonna help your case. I swear you crack me up sometimes, man.
 
Seriously, though… you missed my point entirely. It may surprise, maybe even shock you to realize that, while it is not a conspiracy theory like some people believe, you-know-what’s threat to humanity has been entirely miscalculated. And MBFC or not, there aren’t enough LOLs in the Laniakea Supercluster for the idea that anything CNN and others of its ilk churn out should be taken at face value. Not necessarily because biased news can’t be factual, but because such outlets seem predisposed towards pandering to the lowest common denominator. This and what sparked these riots are just typical situations where the media takes these stories, spin them for clicks, and spin them for views.
 
But that’s neither here nor there.
 
And anyway, I hope the the rest of your night is as pleasant as you are, Tex.
 
TL;DR — Stop jumping on the bandwagon for the sake of being conformist. Argumentum ad populum.

@Dsiak  
Everyone should read your comment. How you said, the modern media is a goddamn joke, specially becase we need to remember the people in those media are professionals who should be doing an excellent job, but we get trash and lies instead. This is a serious problem, problem some people just don’t want to see or they simply doesn’t care, because, indifference I guess. The most sad fact here IMO is, that there’s no one else to blame but us. Yes, us, people who know what’s really happening. It’s like we were the problem just because we know the reality behind the lies they sell us.

@GasMaskGuy98  
 
Surely these are legit, unbiased sources. Surely they don’t rush to write whatever the second someone posts a video on twitter. These companies undoubtedly have journalists on the ground has opposed to a team of only twitter surfers reverberating opinions and blocking out the facts. None of them had to pay 250 million donalds to the boi they defamed.  
 
Just take this whole “end of derpibooru” for an example, the journalist that wrote that reddit tier article talked to a total of one person, No attempts to reach out opposing voices, didn’t raise any numbers, didn’t fact check any claim. The next article the Hungarian article had sources like Know your Meme and twitter. And when someone present a challenge? They chimp out and call for bans, censoring and doxing. All the while these lunatics accuse the opposition of doing what they are doing. Modern media is a joke and to think mods gave in to their tyranny is cringe, not gonna lie.

@GasMaskGuy98  
It’s kinda sad that I apparently live in your head rent free when I don’t care enough who you are to bother following that Derpi link to see what you’re on about, but it wraps back around to knee-slappin’ hi-larious that your attempt at a five alarm sickburn or whatever is based around uncritically swallowing whatever MBFC spits out.

@TexasUberAlles  
LOL I’m not the one chatting with my own alt accounts in here.  
Well, my days of taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle.
 
It’s not surprising, seeing how in one of our anterior discussions you linked search engine results that contained websites like Canada Free Press and CNN to name (but) a few. Not sure why you think you’re in a position to talk trash.  

@Officer Hotpants  
HAHAHAHA! Sadly true.

@Officer Hotpants  
LOL I’m not the one chatting with my own alt accounts in here.

@TexasUberAlles  
Watching you is like watching my cat hiss at his reflection.

@Dsiak  
I can handle them without having a fit  
And yet, the constant screeching.

@GasMaskGuy98  
Funny how she erased my comment when I was agree with you with all the other guys commenting the theme.  
Under the “Off-Topic” excuse. HA! Why this comment isn’t erased yet? I don’t see a relation with the theme too.