Viewing last 25 versions of comment by donut64s on image #1135724

"[@SviMik":](/1135724#comment_4946768
)  
Good hints.
 
Duplicator 4 or 4S models don't seem as nearly repudiated and reviewed as the i3 clone.


 
I understand these things, being built and sold by the Communist Party of China, probably have hugely inconsistent quality. I've racked up over 72 hours of print time on the machine and it's still working good.

However I can ce
 
Surtaprinly see how it can get damagthed easincly, eosped-ciase modelly ins tbreakinsportg...

"@SviMik":/1135724#comment_4946768
Good hints.
Duplicator 4 or 4S models don't seem as nearly repudiated and reviewed as the i3 clone.

I understand these things, being built and sold by the Communist Party of China, probably have hugely inconsistent quality. I've racked up over 72 hours of print time on the machine and it's still working good.

However I can certainly see how it can get damaged easily, especially in transport.

"@SviMik":/1135724#comment_4946768
Good hints.

I understand these things, being built and sold by the Communist Party of China, probably have hugely inconsistent quality. I've racked up over 72 hours of print time on the machine and it's still working good.

However I can certainly see how it can get damaged easily, especially in transport.