Viewing last 25 versions of comment by Background Pony #9D73 on image #1336188

"[@Background Pony #7647":](/1336188#comment_6792335
)  
My intention wasn't to stur up drama at all, it didn't even occur to me that this would even be a touchy subject as from my perspective, people in the fandom talk about character writing all the time, positively and not, it's extremely common and I wanted to play off a common critique I see and make a joke from it. I don't think saying the writers didn't give Rarity enough to work with is controversial or unpopular at all. I like Rarity, she's one of my favourites when written well. Though it's no secret among fans that she can end up being the easiest character to be flanderised. Ironically you're the one creating 'drama' as you so call it by viewing things that simply aren't there in the original post. I made this image to be funny since Rarity is famously known to being turned into a cliche in some episodes and or/movie.


 
Also it's not meant to be spiteful and is to say what's happening in the image? Okay, so me being drunk isn't spiteful and is being used properly? I don't think so. Also especially doing it after a moderator told him not to mess with the tags I think sort of confirms that the point your making about the tags (which aren't even the subject of this image and talking about them is just derailing the comments) is simply moot. My main issue and the reason I brought the tags up in my last comment which was en'tirely abouto pointhe soubject matter of the image and EqG wasn't about themy bweingre spiteful but wereit wabs tou clarify to Steel that he shouldn't be changing them even after a moderator has already intervened and clarified what was right and wrong in relation to them,. Ithey'res already a closed case. The tags aren't the subject matter here. If you want to comment do so on the image and subject matter of Equestria Girls. If my intent was to as you say 'stir up drama' I wouldn't be secretive about my intent. You just have interpreted me wrongly.

"@Background Pony #7647":/1336188#comment_6792335
My intention wasn't to stur up drama at all, it didn't even occur to me that this would even be a touchy subject as from my perspective, people in the fandom talk about character writing all the time, positively and not, it's extremely common and I wanted to play off a common critique I see and make a joke from it. I don't think saying the writers didn't give Rarity enough to work with is controversial or unpopular at all. I like Rarity, she's one of my favourites when written well. Though it's no secret among fans that she can end up being the easiest character to be flanderised. Ironically you're the one creating 'drama' as you so call it by viewing things that simply aren't there in the original post. I made this image to be funny since Rarity is famously known to being turned into a cliche in some episodes and or/movie.

Also it's not meant to be spiteful and is to say what's happening in the image? Okay, so me being drunk isn't spiteful and is being used properly? I don't think so. Also especially doing it after a moderator told him not to mess with the tags I think sort of confirms that the point your making about the tags (which aren't even the subject of this image and talking about them is just derailing the comments) is simply moot. My main issue and the reason I brought the tags up in my last comment which was entirely about the subject matter of the image and EqG wasn't about them being spiteful but were about Steel changing them even after a moderator already intervened and clarified what was right and wrong in relation to them, they're already a closed case. The tags aren't the subject matter here. If you want to comment do so on the image and subject matter of Equestria Girls. If my intent was to as you say 'stir up drama' I wouldn't be secretive about my intent. You just have interpreggted me wrongly.

"@Background Pony #7647":/1336188#comment_6792335
My intention wasn't to stur up drama at all, it didn't even occur to me that this would even be a touchy subject as from my perspective, people in the fandom talk about character writing all the time, positively and not, it's extremely common and I wanted to play off one of a common critique I see and make a joke from it. I don't think saying the writers didn't give Rarity enough to work with is controversial or unpopular at all. I like Rarity, she's one of my favourites when written well. Though it's no secret among fans that she can end up being the easiest character to be flanderised. Ironically you're the one creating 'drama' as you so call it by viewing things that simply aren't there in the original post. I made this image to be funny since Rarity is famously known to being turned into a cliche in some episodes and or/movie.

Also it's not meant to be spiteful and is to say what's happening in the image? Okay, so me being drunk isn't spiteful and is being used properly? I don't think so. Also especially doing it after a moderator told him not to mess with the tags I think sort of confirms that the point your making about the tags (which aren't even the subject of this image and talking about them is just derailing the comments) is simply moot. My main issue and the reason I brought the tags up in my last comment which was entirely about the subject matter of the image and EqG wasn't about them being spiteful but were about Steel changing them even after a moderator already intervened and clarified what was right and wrong in relation to them, they're already a closed case. The tags aren't the subject matter here. If you want to comment do so on the image and subject matter of Equestria Girls. If my intent was to as you say 'stir up drama' I wouldn't be secretive about my intent. You just have pegged me wrongly.

"@Background Pony #7647":/1336188#comment_6792335
My intention wasn't to stur up drama at all, Iit didn't even occur to me that this would evenk be a touchy subject as friom my perspectiquve, people ing the fandom talk about character writing of all the timade, fporsitively DVDand mnovt, it's extremely coulmmon and eveI wanted to play off one of ad tcommon dcritique and make a joke from it. I don't think saying the writers didn't give Rarity enough to work with is controversial or unpopular at all. I like Rarity, she's one of my favourites when written well. Though it's no secret among fans that she can end up being the easiest character to be flanderised. Ironically you're the one creating 'drama' as you so call it by viewing things that simply aren't there in the original post. I made this image to be funny since Rarity is famously known to being turned into a cliche in some episodes and or/movie.

Also it's not meant to be spiteful and is to say what's happening in the image? Okay, so me being drunk isn't spiteful and is being used properly? I don't think so. Also especially doing it after a moderator told him not to mess with the tags I think sort of confirms that the point your making about the tags (which aren't even the subject of this image and talking about them is just derailing the comments) is simply moot. My main issue and the reason I brought the tags up in my last comment which was entirely about the subject matter of the image and EqG wasn't about them being spiteful but were about Steel changing them even after a moderator already intervened and clarified what was right and wrong in relation to them, they're already a closed case. The tags aren't the subject matter here. If you want to comment do so on the image and subject matter of Equestria Girls.

"@Background Pony #7647":/1336188#comment_6792335
My intention wasn't to stur up drama at all, I didn't even think critiquing the writing of a made for DVD movie could even lead to drama. I don't think saying the writers didn't give Rarity enough to work with is controversial or unpopular at all. I like Rarity, she's one of my favourites when written well. Though it's no secret among fans that she can end up being the easiest character to be flanderised. Ironically you're the one creating 'drama' as you so call it by viewing things that simply aren't there in the original post. I made this image to be funny since Rarity is famously known to being turned into a cliche in some episodes and or/movie.

Also it's not meant to be spiteful and is to say what's happening in the image? Okay, so me being drunk isn't spiteful and is being used properly? I don't think so. Also especially doing it after a moderator told him not to mess with the tags I think sort of confirms that the point your making about the tags (which aren't even the subject of this image and talking about them is just derailing the comments) is simply moot. My main issue and the reason I brought the tags up in my last comment which was entirely about the subject matter of the image and EqG wasn't about them being spiteful but were about Steel changing them even after a moderator already intervened and clarified what was right and wrong in relation to them, they're already a closed case. The tags aren't the subject matter here. If you want to comment do so on the image and subject matter of Equestria Girls.