Background Pony #8708
"[@Josh103":](/1339361#comment_5775137
)
If you think I am using buzzwords, tell me where I'm using them. Don't just say that I use them, Tell me where they are. And about you ignoring what I say:
"
[@Background Pony #D036":](/1339361#comment_5772273
[bq="Background) Pony
>#D036"]
"
> [@Josh103":](/1339361#comment_5771994
)
> OK? You find the action seems more interesting than the slice of life, but don't think the action scenes are all that interesting. This tells me that you find the slice of life stuff a lot less interesting. There's nothing wrong with that, but the fact that you continue to watch a show that barely has any action in it and is almost entirely slice of life, slice of life which you imply doesn't interest you, is incredibly baffling.[/bq]
You responded with:
"
[@Josh103":](/1339361#comment_5773324
[bq="Josh103"]) "
> [@Background Pony #D036":](/1339361#comment_5772273
)
> There's a lot more baffling things in this universe than some supposed oxymoronic opinion I have my comrade.[/bq]
Completely ignoring the main point of my comment and just dismissing it offhand based on a single sentence. People tend to do this when they don't have a valid argument. I also pointed out your misuse of the word oxymoron which you didn't respond to. And then there's this gem:
"
[@Josh103":](/1339361#comment_5774637
[bq="Josh103"]) "
> [@Background Pony #D036":](/1339361#comment_5774549
)
> Much like yourself mate.
>
> A fine showing of hypocrisy.[/bq]
In my previous comment I explained why contrivance isn't automatically a flaw, you completely ignored everything I said in that comment and just proceeded to call me a hypocrite without responding to anything else I said. Maybe you're not doing this intentionally, but you do often dismiss a lot of my points based on a single sentence in my comment and then proceed to attack that while not addressing anything else I say. This is a fact. If you want to try to disprove it, read my whole comment, don't skim it, and address every single point I make. Otherwise I can't take you seriously. Also, about the action scenes, after you explained it to me, I did get it, But you had to explain it to me. And my ideas about an action scene are not personal, they are the very core of a good action scene, they are objective. If an action scene doesn't have tension, it's just a bunch of things happening at once. You might be entertained by that, and if so, go watch the hobbit movies. There a good example of tensionless action.
If you think I am using buzzwords, tell me where I'm using them. Don't just say that I use them, Tell me where they are. And about you ignoring what I say:
"
[@Background Pony #D036
[bq="Background
>
"
> [@Josh103
> OK? You find the action seems more interesting than the slice of life, but don't think the action scenes are all that interesting. This tells me that you find the slice of life stuff a lot less interesting. There's nothing wrong with that, but the fact that you continue to watch a show that barely has any action in it and is almost entirely slice of life, slice of life which you imply doesn't interest you, is incredibly baffling.
You responded with:
"
[@Josh103
[bq="Josh103"]
> [@Background Pony #D036
> There's a lot more baffling things in this universe than some supposed oxymoronic opinion I have my comrade.
Completely ignoring the main point of my comment and just dismissing it offhand based on a single sentence. People tend to do this when they don't have a valid argument. I also pointed out your misuse of the word oxymoron which you didn't respond to. And then there's this gem:
"
[@Josh103
[bq="Josh103"]
> [@Background Pony #D036
> Much like yourself mate.
>
> A fine showing of hypocrisy.
In my previous comment I explained why contrivance isn't automatically a flaw, you completely ignored everything I said in that comment and just proceeded to call me a hypocrite without responding to anything else I said. Maybe you're not doing this intentionally, but you do often dismiss a lot of my points based on a single sentence in my comment and then proceed to attack that while not addressing anything else I say. This is a fact. If you want to try to disprove it, read my whole comment, don't skim it, and address every single point I make. Otherwise I can't take you seriously. Also, about the action scenes, after you explained it to me, I did get it, But you had to explain it to me. And my ideas about an action scene are not personal, they are the very core of a good action scene, they are objective. If an action scene doesn't have tension, it's just a bunch of things happening at once. You might be entertained by that, and if so, go watch the hobbit movies. There a good example of tensionless action.