Krynnymuffin
"@toxicitzi":/1454367#comment_6199883
Are you implying the concept is not the subject matter of the picture?
If it was just the ponies, that'd be one thing, but the flags are also displayed promptly over a white background with no other distractions, then there's the meta; the author's intentions behind the image. Those are also taken into account to a degree (the degree of which they are taken to account is a whole other conversation). However, to imply that the concept of a sexuality spectrum itself is not a main subject of the image is just a stretch as best and downright disingenuous at worst.
EVEN SO, I have my reasons for downvoting, as described in my previous comment, and so did everyone else who downvoted (maybe). Your assumptions imply that people are looking for this image only to downvote it, and I just do not think that's the case.
Otherwise there'd be waaay more downvotes.
Are you implying the concept is not the subject matter of the picture?
If it was just the ponies, that'd be one thing, but the flags are also displayed promptly over a white background with no other distractions, then there's the meta; the author's intentions behind the image. Those are also taken into account to a degree (the degree of which they are taken to account is a whole other conversation). However, to imply that the concept of a sexuality spectrum itself is not a main subject of the image is just a stretch as best and downright disingenuous at worst.
EVEN SO, I have my reasons for downvoting, as described in my previous comment, and so did everyone else who downvoted (maybe). Your assumptions imply that people are looking for this image only to downvote it, and I just do not think that's the case.
Otherwise there'd be waaay more downvotes.