Background Pony #58B9
"[@Twilights-Secret":](/1605220#comment_6734014
[bq=")
> Twilights-Secret"] Twilights Secret
>
> It's a very cute pic. I really like it.
"
>
> [@Background Pony #B2C5":](/1605220#comment_6733947
")
> [@dinosaurcol":](/1605220#comment_6733954
")
> [@Background Pony #6432":](/1605220#comment_6733965
)
> I can understand if you're saying "this needs that tag", but the tag is strictly "if in a diaper and not a baby", so if the character is a "baby", it doesn't qualify for the tag.
>
> It's kinda dumb but it's an easier way the site's mods have chosen for delimiting what's "diaper fetish" vs what's just a picture that happens to have a character in a diaper. And seeing as Northern Haste is a toddler in the picture, they're pretty much a baby.
>
> There's no hard definition on what a "baby" is, but Google says "a very young child" and Webster says "an extremely young child", so...
>
> But if you're saying "ew diaper fetish", then I'd remind you you're on a pony fansite and I can't help but notice the irony that someone who's into what a lot of people would view as oddly childish and possibly pedophilic (adults/teens liking My Little Pony) would then return the favor and do the exact same thing to others ("diaper lovers").
>
> Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.[/bq]
I actually agree with you there, Anyone who views this as pedophilic is stupid, People need to be more open minded and less straight-up stupid.
[bq="
> Twilights-Secret
>
> It's a very cute pic. I really like it.
"
>
> [@Background Pony #B2C5
"
> [@dinosaurcol
"
> [@Background Pony #6432
> I can understand if you're saying "this needs that tag", but the tag is strictly "if in a diaper and not a baby", so if the character is a "baby", it doesn't qualify for the tag.
>
> It's kinda dumb but it's an easier way the site's mods have chosen for delimiting what's "diaper fetish" vs what's just a picture that happens to have a character in a diaper. And seeing as Northern Haste is a toddler in the picture, they're pretty much a baby.
>
> There's no hard definition on what a "baby" is, but Google says "a very young child" and Webster says "an extremely young child", so...
>
> But if you're saying "ew diaper fetish", then I'd remind you you're on a pony fansite and I can't help but notice the irony that someone who's into what a lot of people would view as oddly childish and possibly pedophilic (adults/teens liking My Little Pony) would then return the favor and do the exact same thing to others ("diaper lovers").
>
> Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
I actually agree with you there, Anyone who views this as pedophilic is stupid, People need to be more open minded and less straight-up stupid.