BackgroundLoL
"@Esteban":/1656888#comment_6905347
So you *do* claim Alexlayer, Darth Shy, Background Pony #C543, and MaresFillies are also me? Even though Alexlayer had been here for 5 years, and Mares Files had one for 4 years.
I don't think yiu have the right to call others "obessive", seeing you now have paranoia everyone is me. And talk about projection - your multiple ad hominem's are _obviously_ you venting yiur frustration you cannot create any reall counterarguments by this point. At least o it comes of if you only attack me, and claim *everyone* is me.
And you failed to mention *one* example of there being a comparable contradiction to the one this book has with canon - you only stated one assumption, then started to just attack me, my motives, and now making borderline insane looikng claims.
And as I mentioned, all of this is still a false equivalence - "@BackgroundLoL":/1656888#comment_6903233
[bq="BackgroundLoL"] "@Esteban":/1656888#comment_6902980
And your example is not only wrong (due to mistaking assumptions, for canon), as mentioned by Background Pony #3A99, your whole argument is based on false assumptions - the two episodes, had the same, _primary/1st place_ level of canon, and as a rule, all secondary canon (like books or comics), are overriden and rendered noncanon by _primary/1st place_ canon/animated works.
Like (as mentioned bwllow) with the Fiendship is Magic comic prequell about Sirens and Star Swirl, being overriden by telling of the Dazzlings sending to the human world by Star Swirl in season 7. Or how Moondancer was a _very_ different, and different aged character, than shown in the cartoon, i the comics, and cartoon Moondancer is canon.
The only difference is that Twilight Sparkle’s Science Fair Sparks _writes itself in the first place_ with stary that is contradicted by prmary canon.
I don't want to go into arguable ad hominem, as Background Pony #3A99 suggested you did, but if anything, you come of as overly defensive (for some reason), of this book's canonicity.
I apolognize if it's not the case, but as of now, you essentially argue this book should be an exception to rules, that pretty much governed all other works, and their canonicity.... [/bq]
This is something you didn't adress, just preffered to attack me.
So you *do* claim Alexlayer, Darth Shy, Background Pony #C543, and MaresFillies are also me? Even though Alexlayer had been here for 5 years, and Mares Files had one for 4 years.
I don't think yiu have the right to call others "obessive", seeing you now have paranoia everyone is me. And talk about projection - your multiple ad hominem's are _obviously_ you venting yiur frustration you cannot create any reall counterarguments by this point. At least o it comes of if you only attack me, and claim *everyone* is me.
And you failed to mention *one* example of there being a comparable contradiction to the one this book has with canon - you only stated one assumption, then started to just attack me, my motives, and now making borderline insane looikng claims.
And as I mentioned, all of this is still a false equivalence - "@BackgroundLoL":/1656888#comment_6903233
[bq="BackgroundLoL"] "@Esteban":/1656888#comment_6902980
And your example is not only wrong (due to mistaking assumptions, for canon), as mentioned by Background Pony #3A99, your whole argument is based on false assumptions - the two episodes, had the same, _primary/1st place_ level of canon, and as a rule, all secondary canon (like books or comics), are overriden and rendered noncanon by _primary/1st place_ canon/animated works.
Like (as mentioned bwllow) with the Fiendship is Magic comic prequell about Sirens and Star Swirl, being overriden by telling of the Dazzlings sending to the human world by Star Swirl in season 7. Or how Moondancer was a _very_ different, and different aged character, than shown in the cartoon, i the comics, and cartoon Moondancer is canon.
The only difference is that Twilight Sparkle’s Science Fair Sparks _writes itself in the first place_ with stary that is contradicted by prmary canon.
I don't want to go into arguable ad hominem, as Background Pony #3A99 suggested you did, but if anything, you come of as overly defensive (for some reason), of this book's canonicity.
I apolognize if it's not the case, but as of now, you essentially argue this book should be an exception to rules, that pretty much governed all other works, and their canonicity.... [/bq]
This is something you didn't adress, just preffered to attack me.