DarkSonata
I’m sorry but I’ve seen you discussing this topic many times and I still don’t see any point beyond being frustrated that the show didn’t go for your own headcanon.
"
[@Daneasaur":](/1783518#comment_7322196
[bq="Daneasaur"])
> The people who wanted to put wings on Spike had no basis to put wings on him for any reason outside of headcanon.
[/bq]
>
And Spike being some rare kind of dragon that doesn’t have wings was also always nothing but headcanon too. It just seems like you’re treating their headcanon as something that was wrong to have, while your own headcanon of him not growing wings was somehow ok? Why? Because you were super sure? Because previous Spikes didn’t have wings even thought they’re not the same character? Why did people who wanted Spike (a member of a species of winged creatures) to eventually grow wings, needed any “basis” other than dragons having wings and looking better with them?
"
[@Daneasaur":](/1783518#comment_7322196
[bq="Daneasaur"])
> It didn't matter if it "looked nice" or if they "preferred" Spike with wings, there was nothing in the show's lore that said he would or should ever grow them.
[/bq]
>
There was also nothing in the show’s lore that said there were any dragons that never grew wings. Yet you seemed to be so sure the show was pointing on that direction because it was your headcanon to believe so. There’s no difference.
Also, yes it does matter if it looked nice or if they preffered it that way. That by itself goes against your argument because like BP said, dragons having wings is such a normal, common and popular trait, most people immediately identify dragons having them. So it makes way more sense that people wanted him to get wings because of that rather than Spyro, who not everyone who likes Spike is even a fan of.
It makes sense that some Spyro fans saw the similaries between them since earlier, but its ridiculous to think that was ever the main reason for the “pro-wings” people. Spike’s wing situation was a big topic about his character almost since the begining, and I can’t believe you can’t see why lot of people wanted him to get them even without knowing anything about Spyro.
"
[@Daneasaur":](/1783518#comment_7322244
[bq="Daneasaur"])
> Pro-wing folks had only headcanon and no in-show facts for wanting Spike to have wings. A lot of these people are spyro fans.[/bq]
Really unfair. You also only ever had headcanons and no in-show facts for anything, yet you complained more than anyone else on this site.
You’re so pissed about his wings its like the staff personally promised you something and then backed of. From what I remember from previous discussions over this, people told you many times: Stuff like nictitating membranes, Spike digging a couple of times or his greed form having bulky shape, none of those things were facts for anything. Yet you treated them like they were while claiming people who wanted wings only wanted them because Spyro.
That’s why people always argue with you. Because you try to generalize as dismiss other’s prefferences despite your entire sidebehaving always been based on stuffa headcanon you “wanted” but had no real arguments for either.
"
[@Daneasaur
[bq="Daneasaur"]
> The people who wanted to put wings on Spike had no basis to put wings on him for any reason outside of headcanon.
[/bq]
>
And Spike being some rare kind of dragon that doesn’t have wings was also always nothing but headcanon too. It just seems like you’re treating their headcanon as something that was wrong to have, while your own headcanon of him not growing wings was somehow ok? Why? Because you were super sure? Because previous Spikes didn’t have wings even thought they’re not the same character? Why did people who wanted Spike (a member of a species of winged creatures) to eventually grow wings, needed any “basis” other than dragons having wings and looking better with them?
"
[@Daneasaur
[bq="Daneasaur"]
> It didn't matter if it "looked nice" or if they "preferred" Spike with wings, there was nothing in the show's lore that said he would or should ever grow them.
[/bq]
>
There was also nothing in the show’s lore that said there were any dragons that never grew wings. Yet you seemed to be so sure the show was pointing on that direction because it was your headcanon to believe so. There’s no difference.
Also, yes it does matter if it looked nice or if they preffered it that way. That by itself goes against your argument because like BP said, dragons having wings is such a normal, common and popular trait, most people immediately identify dragons having them. So it makes way more sense that people wanted him to get wings because of that rather than Spyro, who not everyone who likes Spike is even a fan of.
It makes sense that some Spyro fans saw the similaries between them since earlier, but its ridiculous to think that was ever the main reason for the “pro-wings” people. Spike’s wing situation was a big topic about his character almost since the begining, and I can’t believe you can’t see why lot of people wanted him to get them even without knowing anything about Spyro.
"
[@Daneasaur
[bq="Daneasaur"]
> Pro-wing folks had only headcanon and no in-show facts for wanting Spike to have wings. A lot of these people are spyro fans.
Really unfair. You also only ever had headcanons and no in-show facts for anything, yet you complained more than anyone else on this site.
You’re so pissed about his wings its like the staff personally promised you something and then backed of. From what I remember from previous discussions over this, people told you many times: Stuff like nictitating membranes, Spike digging a couple of times or his greed form having bulky shape, none of those things were facts for anything. Yet you treated them like they were while claiming people who wanted wings only wanted them because Spyro.
That’s why people always argue with you. Because you try to generalize as dismiss other’s prefferences despite your entire side