PaintEdits 
"[@Iron_Shield":](/images/2230216#comment_8705548
)
Not sure either but again, it's far too vague/general a statement even if true. Depends on their build/how they've trained etc.
Like here's an earth pony.
>>1329946t
Here's a pegasus pony
>>14317091567t
If earth ponies are stronger, you're telling me Applebloom's going to win in a fight? Obviously not. So are we comparing pound to pound? Trained/untrained? There's a lot of variables to consider. The only reason I argued
"
[@Iron_Shield":](/images/2230216#comment_8704795
[bq="Iron_Shield"]) "
> [@Background Pony #7C19":](/images/2230216#comment_8704218
)
> yes but that is because earthponies are much stronger and have more stamina.[/bq]
Is because it claims "earthponies" are stronger, not "some earth ponies" not "in most cases".
When you argue "all" you have to be demonstrably correct or someone's just going to poke holes in said argument.
Moved to Twibooru
Not sure either but again, it's far too vague/general a statement even if true. Depends on their build/how they've trained etc.
Like here's an earth pony.
>>1329946t
Here's a pegasus pony
>>
If earth ponies are stronger, you're telling me Applebloom's going to win in a fight? Obviously not. So are we comparing pound to pound? Trained/untrained? There's a lot of variables to consider. The only reason I argued
"
[@Iron_Shield
[bq="Iron_Shield"]
> [@Background Pony #7C19
> yes but that is because earthponies are much stronger and have more stamina.
Is because it claims "earthponies" are stronger, not "some earth ponies" not "in most cases".
When you argue "all" you have to be demonstrably correct or someone's just going to poke holes in said argument.