@penjacker  
Yea, I think I do see the mistakes. Some thin white lines, the white v on the bottom right and whatnot.
 
But to be fair, they are not the main focus of the pic, and you can barely see them when the pic is not zoomed in.

@penjacker  
Your so based

@Wrong White  
Cope with seething? If I’d given some indication that I was angry I would understand this sentiment but I’m just disappointed.

@penjacker  
Seething

@RomajiMiltonAmulo  
At what point have I complained about the mistakes? All I’ve done is point them out. And there’s more than one- you’re not paying attention either.

@penjacker  
Okay so… That’s like, one thing in the background, that you have to put the image at full size to see, that’s probably a pixel wide  
And he’s saying to stop complaining about small details

@BlazeHeartUnicorn  
…You’re familiar with the concept of colouring within the lines, right? And you can recognise the thin line caused by using the bucket tool?
 
 
@Wrong White  
What’s there to cope with?

@penjacker  
Well, my eyes are probably not as keen as yours. I guess I’m not to sure what to even look for.

@penjacker  
Cope

@BlazeHeartUnicorn  
I’m glad that they don’t bother you, but if you can’t see them, then you’re not paying attention.

@penjacker  
Eh, I’m not really seeing the mistakes, so they don’t bother me.

@BlazeHeartUnicorn  
I never mentioned the background? We were talking about mistakes and lazy things like using the bucket tool without then going over to fix errors. I can’t see any of the latter in the background of the ych but there are still plenty of the former. As it happens, he did use the bucket tool without error-correcting in the background of this piece- the purple shapes in the bottom corners were coloured with that method.
 
@BlazeHeartUnicorn  
Having mistakes and being simplistic are in no way the same. If anything, they’re anathema to one another- in a piece with a more complex style, like Cuddlehooves’ painted style, little bits of colour in the wrong place are much more to be expected. In a simpler, cartoonier style like this piece is, though, those mistakes stand out much more and make the piece look worse, or at least like less care was taken in making it.

@penjacker  
Well, you said he did the same thing to the background in the link you send us like in this pic. But in all honestly, the background in the link looks more detailed then the one here.

@BlazeHeartUnicorn  
How come what looks more detailed?

We need a wet edit

@marinus18  
Exactly my question

@penjacker  
If he did it in the pic you linked, then how come it looks more detailed? It would be of equal quality to this one and I don’t see that.

@Background Pony #153D  
Or maybe he CHOSE for it to be simplistic like this.

@Background Pony #153D  
Where should there be spots?

@Background Pony #153D  
He did it with a $110 ych, no surprise he did it here. Looking at it again now, I’m noticing even more mistakes…

Shining armor should also be padded!

Aw~ Adorable

Awwwwww, very heartwarming.

This is so cute o my gosh

I wish they weren’t so lazy with their coloring. Just like with the last one, there is a TON of missed spots, obviously done with the fill tool, and no combing over to find any corrections to be made. It’s disappointing, really…