Uploaded by anonymous_user_23_dec_2020
600x434 JPG 113 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH dead source50558 +-SH safe2260173 +-SH artist:maim46 +-SH princess celestia116710 +-SH alicorn334338 +-SH pony1691659 +-SH g42120562 +-SH 22 questions from creationists2 +-SH atheism77 +-SH blurry background2783 +-SH creationism24 +-SH evolution239 +-SH female1900705 +-SH god287 +-SH goddess733 +-SH grin66773 +-SH looking at you281086 +-SH misspelling3330 +-SH notebook930 +-SH parody17730 +-SH parody of a parody143 +-SH question1475 +-SH religion794 +-SH smiling429175 +-SH solo1499830 +-SH sunset8334 +-SH text95895 +-SH trollestia876
Loading...
Loading...
Or she.
Weebles wobble, but they don’t fall down.
IM DOIN IT RONG CORECT? >;D
Tide goes in, stain comes out. Never a miscommunication.
@ClavisRozen
Oi…
tide goes in, tide goes out, you can’t explain that.
Eyyup. In fact, “we don’t know yet” is arguably the main driving force of science.
Of course anyone’s free to plug any and all holes in our scientific knowledge with [insert creator here] but those holes tend to get smaller as the knowledge accumulates…
More than a tad. Cognitive dissonance gets them every time. There’s nothing wrong with answering a question with “We don’t know, yet.”
Questions about obscure, esoteric things is a good way to quickly stump pretty much anyone who doesn’t happen to be a specialist in that particular field, after all…
Also, call me crazy, but asking for scientific evidence (#16 (“What mechanism has science discovered that evidences…?”)) while rejecting a priori one of the most thoroughly researched, most widely-accepted, cornerstone facts of modern science seems just a tad inherently dishonest.
Actually, I’ve found that most creationists ask those questions not out of genuine curiosity, but out of an absurd attempt to “checkmate” non-creationists. They think that science can’t answer them, so they ask them as a sort of “gotcha” moment. It’s sad how few of them are actually looking for answers beyond “Goddidit”.
I’d go with the Futurama theory that God is a gaseous sentient gob in deep space, were I more interested in Jehovah/Yahwey/Allah. :j
I object to your assessment. Some of them are actually good questions which merit response: #9 (about origin of single-celled organisms), #13 (about metamorphosis), and #16 (“What mechanism has science discovered that evidences an increase of genetic information seen in any genetic mutation or evolutionary process?”).
Where we have strong emotions, we are likely to reach the wrong conclusions. I think you have concluded that everyone who holds an interest in creationist thinking is unwilling or unable to undergo a change of mind. If so, I believe this conclusion is in error. One does not ask questions of the sort in those examples if one is not looking for an honest answer.
it gets dark.
mission accomplished
So’s the Earth being
roundan oblate spheroid!(And, just to satisfy my raging need for pedantry, 1min=60sec isn’t a theory, but an arbitrary definition.)
One minute being 60 seconds is just a theory!
Eh. :)
I would have posted something similar but was away at the time you asked.
(Kidding. That was the correct response. It don’t matter who says it. X3 )
I would also join the Church Of Celestia.
Celestia 1
Atheists 0
Arsenal 3