…You made me too weak to get it up.

Ummm~ how is that different from regular seduction

@The Smiling Pony  
Even if it’s very specifically about Squidward? Okay.

@Background Pony #5771  
Should just tag SpongeBob Squarepants (if that’s the name of the show).

@The Smiling Pony  
Okay, what about if a picture has Sweetie Belle alone, but mentions Squidward for example, though? Would that still get both “SpongeBob Squarepants” and “Squidward” tags because Squidward is the mentioned character and he’s from SpongeBob?
 
If that’s all the same, I’m just a little confused how the other image is different but a I think it’s more important to keep it as is (or as I’ve been doing it and nobody complained about) for characters anyway.

@Background Pony #5771  
References to other shows (or things) tend to be fine due to them being rare and generally the entire point of the image. The characters themselves probably shouldn’t be, though.
 
@Background Pony #5771  
There are several joke tags revolving around Pinkie specifically, as well as a lot of “implied character X” when dealing with shipping images (imagine an image of Applejack laying in bed with some rainbow coloured hairs and a blue feather on the pillow next to her, for example).

LOL! Okay there actually is an “Implied Pinkie Pie” tag as I just discovered, but nobody uses it nor should they. :P

@Prof.NightJack  
>I never said anything about the ’implied rape’ tag, it’s around for a reason, don’t put words in my mouth.
 
I didn’t say you said anything, it was an example of something that there is an alternative tag for it just being implied. There’s no “Implied Pinkie Pie” when you have a pic of Dashie mentioning her, though so it should be tagged “Pinkie Pie” and things like that are.

@Background Pony #5771  
I never said anything about the ‘implied rape’ tag, it’s around for a reason, don’t put words in my mouth.  
I’ll admit I make mistakes about some things, like with the ‘semi-grimdark’ tag here, but with the others I knew what didn’t belong.

@The Smiling Pony  
What if you wanna search it and references to it are cool too? If she mentioned a TV show or something the tag for that would be added even when the characters aren’t present, wouldn’t it?

@Prof.NightJack  
And if you’re a “THE WORD RAPE TRIGGERS ME!!!!!” type person and don’t want to read it? I figured the “implied rape” tag was more for a character leaning on top of another suggestively and the other character clearly not consenting without being blunt about it, but either way, we’re not adding a “implied ___” tag for everything.

@Background Pony #5771  
No, they wouldn’t be. The reason implied rape / rape do get tagged on these things is because it’s a topic that upsets a significant amount of people.
 
If people are offended by schoolgirl uniforms they might need to grow up a bit.

@The Smiling Pony  
So this wouldn’t be tagged schoolgirl, school uniform, or sex change even though two of them are directly stated and one is implied, for example?
 

@Background Pony #5771  
You don’t know what the tags are use for, do you?  
If I want to find a image with nudity in it then I will search for the tag ‘nudity’ but if I find an image with out it and just the WORD then it is wrongly tagged, or say I wont to filter out images with something in it but don’t care of the word in it, will I could miss a nuber of image some I may want to see if they all get that tag and some doesn’t have them in it at all.

@Background Pony #5771  
No.

@Prof.NightJack  
I will continue to add back tags of things mentioned in the images. Let’s get that out of the way too with The Smiling Pony here, if an image mentions something the tag of that thing can be added if no “implied” version of that tag exists, right? There are plenty of solo images that are tagged with more than one character because the other character is mentioned, for example. This is the correct way to tag, right?

@The Smiling Pony  
Fine… but as long as this idiot doesn’t start adding back tag of things not in the image…

Of course.

@Prof.NightJack  
OK…?
 
suggestive -> questionable -> explicit are completely separate from semi-gridmark -> grimdark, and both separate from grotesque.

@The Smiling Pony  
Well at the lest the two tags are not on the same level…

@Prof.NightJack  
That is not how it works.

@Background Pony #5771  
If you insist on the semi-grimdark tag then remove the questionable tag.

Stop removing the semi-grimdark tag unless you think it deserves a full grimdark tag. It obviously deserves one of the two.

One rating tag is all that is needed…

Well, if I’m the weakest, it won’t be too enjoyable, will it, Bitch?