Uploaded by Background Pony #98D4
839x629 JPG 93 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH suggestive195694 +-SH edit178997 +-SH edited screencap94529 +-SH screencap301147 +-SH fluttershy266148 +-SH pegasus525292 +-SH pony1671634 +-SH g42102534 +-SH putting your hoof down978 +-SH female1879170 +-SH image macro40445 +-SH implied rape1786 +-SH mare787628 +-SH meme96027 +-SH solo1483229
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
I don’t think lawmakers should determine language. They can keep to their law thingy. Linguists and dictionary writers will give definitions that more accurately reflects how people use language.
To me the important thing is that the language effectively communicates what you’re trying to say, and often times legal definitions are very confusing and will just slow down conversations. If you tell someone you were raped, they’d assume you didn’t enjoy the experience. But legally its possible to rape someone who is consenting and enjoys the experience.
“Those are the last words made by the victim before their death.”
When you’re using legal language, you’d damn well better use the legal definition.
“HE MURDERED ME! Well, uh, not by the legal defintion, if you really care about that…”
Misdefining and corrupting legal language in the popular consciousness is how crusaders manage to twist the law to suit themselves.
I think you have a different definition of rape to myself and the OP. That does not make the OP a duck. To some people, sex with a drunk/drugged person who has consented is rape, but I don’t use this definition.
Maybe that’s legally rape, but in language we don’t need to follow the law. To me, rape must involve one party who is does not want to be having sex at that moment. (so the gun example would still be rape, but the idea of the joke is that you can’t rape a person who wants to be raped, and that point still holds)
“YES! WHOOHOOOO!!! ALLLRRRRIIIGHT!!!”
“… You don’t get how this works, do you?”
“?”
I get it. :3
Yes, and…?
I think this was a joke, not meant to be taking seriously.
Like if I hold a gun to your head and tell you to say “yes”.
Or if I slipped you drugs.
It doesn’t count if that’s why you say “yes”.
Can we call OP a duck yet?
>saying no to Yellowquiet
Haha, good one. What are you, gay?
If only SJWs would understand that and try to help, but to them rape is just as the law put it, any other way is not possible.
Ya I probably shouldn’t of said anything about them….
Our current judges and law system in general doesn’t care since they define rape through consent of one side and female only!
Basically, for them, male on male, female on female, and female on male rape do not exist. Only male on female. People are trying to change that.