@helix86  
Who said there was a fight? You’re the only one to say so.  
AlsoIwinlel

@Background Pony #2D1D  
seriously your still goin on about this? dude its like a week old move on, your just fightin to fight at this point.

@helix86  
imply verb  
present participle: implying  
strongly suggest the truth or existence of (something not expressly stated).
 
I said you were implying it was foalcon here @Background Pony #2D1D. I don’t know where you got the idea that I agreed that it was foalcon at all. This is assumed to be a full grown mare in this picture. The only issue might be because she was drawn at an odd angle, or the artist botched the proportions.  
Also, it’s not food censorship. This is the original picture, screencapped. There was never a dick to begin with.

@Background Pony #2D1D  
yes she does appear to be a fully grown mare in other pics but in this pic the style and size makes her appear much younger. so its understandable why most people and even mods would consider her a lil filly in this particular pic.
 
i dont know where an original is, or if it even exists, i only said this looked like one of those stupid food censorship pics.
 
your statement originally looked like you were being sarcastic about my comment about this not bein a foalcon pic, so i assumed you were tryin to say it was, which is why i tried explaining it.
 
in the future you should be clearer with your statements.
 
as for my other thing about ‘it doesnt matter what the original pic is thats not this pic.’ what i was sayin is even if the origional, assumin there is an alternate version somewhere, is foalcon it wouldnt automatically make this one foalcon as well.
 
basically sayin an image isnt good or bad because of other pics like it an image is good or bad based only on itself.

@helix86  
”…the original image is foalcon…”  
Where is this image you speak of? Because Drizzle Spark is a fully grown mare. I wasn’t even talking about the food censorship part.
 
“it doesnt matter what the original pic is thats not this pic.”  
What?

@Background Pony #2D1D  
im aware the original image is foalcon but since this is a food censorship its sexually suggestive but its considered sex. its considered no different the if a person were to lick a banana or hot dog ‘seductively’ its not sexual but sexually suggestive. it doesnt matter what the original pic is thats not this pic.

@helix86  
>foalcon  
Implying.

im not even downvotin this for the foalcon impression, i love foalcon, im downvotin this cause im sick and tired of this retarded food style censorship crap

@CrassMetalHead  
She’s trying as hard as she can!

get this off.