Uploaded by MadHotaru
2000x1500 PNG 1.88 MBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
“RBMK reactor”
Tags
+-SH safe2257429 +-SH artist:madhotaru506 +-SH fluttershy268029 +-SH beaver305 +-SH bird15391 +-SH pony1688927 +-SH squirrel1423 +-SH g42118039 +-SH animal8978 +-SH blueprint243 +-SH chernobyl64 +-SH female1897586 +-SH mouth hold24885 +-SH nuclear reactor7 +-SH physics280 +-SH pointer171 +-SH russian6477 +-SH teaching230 +-SH this will end in death3922 +-SH this will end in nuclear winter8 +-SH this will end in radiation poisoning47 +-SH translated in the description1828 +-SH tree53929
Loading...
Loading...
pulls control rods
power level dips to <3%
oh crap put the rods back in the pool fast
pushes rods in as fast as possible
power surges 10,000%
meltdown ensues
oh fug abandon ship
Just gonna drop this video here, and this Kurzgesagt video and this Kyle Hill one that talks about how many lives would be saved by switching. From mining the resources to operating the plant, deaths per TWH of power produced is lower for nuclear than even wind and solar.
Nuclear produces 4x less carbon emissions than even Solar. Germany’s carbon emissions are 43% higher because they closed so many nuclear powerplants.
Just learned today from the first video that waste from solar is worse than the waste from nuclear, just due to sheer volume of toxic heavy metals ending up in landfills and elsewhere as opposed to a very small amount of a material that is regularly safely contained and stored for nuclear. And funny thing is, much of that is stored just in the same room and water tank as the powerplant core.
…just… don’t plop a reactor with a positive void coefficient in a warehouse without many of the safety features it’s supposed to have with under-trained technicians running it. Even with the big disasters, though, everything I said takes those into account.
“Impossible. RBMK reactors don’t explode.”
“This man is delusional. Take him to the infirmary.”
I just found this picture browsing tags, and a few weeks ago I had heard somewhere else about the Russian government not happy with how the HBO special displays Soviet officials in a not so positive image…
I was always curious why a modern government that is “not soviet” would care how soviets are viewed in a American made for TV movie…
Okay that was a weak attempt at sarcasm, and I Really want to watch this Russian authorized version of the Chernobyl documentary… I’m Very curious what’s different about it from the HBO version, as well as how they both differ from reputable books written about the incident, as I’ve heard from others that the HBO documentary didn’t quite touch upon…
Chernobyl(2019) Fans: “I’m here because of HBO’s Chernobyl.”
And rightly so, because it’s a damn good series.
Same here, did you know the Russians are going to make their own propaganda version of it?
Keeping with the classics. nice
Ok you realize how scary that actually is? Fluttershy has a perfect force for sabotage and assassination missions cause how many guard would hear noise see a rabbit or raccoon stick it head out and think it’s a threat? She could should instant spy and espionage networks any where by just going to a near by park and feeding birds. Fluttershy is a covert operations goddess.
And what’s scary is I don’t think of this till you made a joke.
looks to me like the racoon is failing the test.
And remember to not press the wrong buttons in the wrong order for whatever reason. Politburo might say otherwise, but don’t and say you did.
The Chernobyl No. 4 reactor accident had other things contributing to/causing it, but the RBMK design (at the time, it’s been revised) didn’t help. It was able to burn relatively unenriched uranium, but made some compromises to do so.
The RBMK design had a void coefficient that was positive and very large. This meant that if the core was running hot and voids started to form, the reaction rate would (assuming no intervention) increase at a rapid pace. That would make the core hotter, boil more water, form more voids, and so on.
TL;DR: RBMK (as implemented at Chernobyl No. 4), under certain conditions, ran metaphorically balanced on a knife edge of safety. The operators sucked, but the reactor design made it far worse.
Condescending rant over, you may now leave your seats.
That’s the reactor building. The taller central area is the service hall; the vertical construct within it is used to extract the fuel rod assemblies and insert new ones (hence being shown on a gantry). Then there is the biological shield / concrete cap, below which is the reactor core itself - all the vertical lines are part of the channel assemblies.
Then we have the coolant pipes leading out on each side to the steam separators and the coolant pumps.
Also, Реактор is Russian for ‘Reactor’.
…what do you mean, military? The RBMK series has never had the objective of producing weapons plutonium, it’s energy only.
I know. I can read these and some other letters (which wasn’t obvious). You would be surprised: it’s the same in other languages using the same alphabet! Not only English. ;-) Still not the plan for a reactor. Yes, a part of a power plant. But I see a steam turbine connected by an axle to a generator on top. I don’t want to argue with anypony abourt art.
What I didn’t know was what the abbreviation stands for. That’s an actually (nuclear) power plant. Now I know “Reaktor Bol’shoi Moschnosti Kanalniy”. Thanks.
@Barhandar
Yeah, I got irony points! I will pin them in my collection. Next to the square, which I got because I don’t even deserve a star.
RMBK’s weren’t that bad, it’s just that Chernobyl was a military plant that was converted to civil use, and was lacking several safety measures.
Add incompetence to the mix and you’ll get a recipe for a disaster.
Was that article written by someone British? “Mishandled test” is an accurate, but extremely understating description of what happened.
@Background Pony #E247
Also: ““Certain aspects of the RBMK reactor design … contributed to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, in which an RBMK exploded during a mishandled test[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RBMK)