Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Fallen Oak charity art pack - Nuclear Neighs and Deco Days

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

Remember everyone, when two members of the same sex are near, that does not mean they are homosexuals. Sometimes people are just friends, and sometimes a children’s cartoon is just a children’s cartoon.

safe2204556 screencap298439 pinkie pie259190 earth pony517843 pony1634967 g42059960 the gift of the maud pie1051 background pony12412 john candy24 meme94858 meta18703 neighl page30 not gay235 planes trains and automobiles39 politics1844 ponies standing next to each other221 rage1805 shipping denied1014 shipping goggles25 steve martin34 text91792 train3511 tv-y380 unnamed character4513 unnamed pony2732
Source

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

deactivated9659a69

Actually, yeah, a lot of people do interpret homosexuality where there is none. We are allowed to sit next to someone of the same gender, right? We’re allowed to be FRIENDS with them, right? Friendship is magic.
thevideonasty

We got a soup! soup!
What interpretation though? They’re ponifications of existing characters, one with a wife, and one with a deceased wife who’s death he’s not taking too well.
Background Pony #2B3A
Anyway, on a different tack, I sorta hope someone gets one of those anti-gay organizations up in arms over this; it’d be fun to watch their reaction when everyone laughs at them for not getting the reference.
Background Pony #5DBD
@Exedrus
 
@Brony_Conundrum
 
Ok since a Mod has showed up again, I’m just gonna say “I don’t agree with you but you can believe what you want.” just please don’t reply to me again, I will otherwise regard it as some mad fervor to convert the heretic.
Background Pony #5DBD
@Exedrus  
That doesn’t change what the authors intend, though.
 
It’s hard to believe this all occurred because someone thought two characters were gay when they were not. The characters are from a movie, so we know that the author intention was that they were representations of two movie characters, not two gay people. Do you see what I’m getting at?