@SaturnGrl
I was clearly talking about “dracony” tag that was present at the time. I know about legend of Kirins/Qilins. Now that “dracony” tag isn’t present, there is no longer any need for any consequential answers.
@Background Pony #02CA
What do you mean? Qilin/Kirin/Gilin are cultural creatures, not hybrids. I never identified them as “Dracony”.
I do mention in my DA submission;
Qilin are not “Ponies”. A Qilin is a beast composed of the head of a dragon or tiger, mane of a lion, the hooves of an ox or horse, the tail of a lion or ox, scales of a fish, and it can have either 1 or 2 horns/antlers. It depends on the area of the Orient that the parts of the Qilin are derived from. In Asia, Qilin are considered to be more closely related to Dragons. With how they are constructed, westerners should more correctly classify them as Chimeras, because by definition, a Chimera is “mythical or fictional animal with parts taken from various animals”.
I was clearly talking about “dracony” tag that was present at the time. I know about legend of Kirins/Qilins. Now that “dracony” tag isn’t present, there is no longer any need for any consequential answers.
What do you mean? Qilin/Kirin/Gilin are cultural creatures, not hybrids. I never identified them as “Dracony”.
I do mention in my DA submission;
Qilin are not “Ponies”. A Qilin is a beast composed of the head of a dragon or tiger, mane of a lion, the hooves of an ox or horse, the tail of a lion or ox, scales of a fish, and it can have either 1 or 2 horns/antlers. It depends on the area of the Orient that the parts of the Qilin are derived from. In Asia, Qilin are considered to be more closely related to Dragons. With how they are constructed, westerners should more correctly classify them as Chimeras, because by definition, a Chimera is “mythical or fictional animal with parts taken from various animals”.
>dracony
Isn’t ‘dracony’ hybrid by definition? I think it’s unneeded here.
No Nintendo 😐