Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
My Little Ties crafts shop

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

No description provided.

suggestive197193 artist:tomatocoup349 bow hothoof1507 windy whistles3118 pegasus532890 pony1691344 g42120153 and that's how rainbow dash was made51 awww250 bed62708 blushing293683 chest fluff71877 cowgirl position10606 cute278893 dilf525 duo201783 eyes closed147073 female1900173 flag5962 freckles48200 good clean married sex2205 heart82635 husband and wife2608 male582480 mare800044 married803 married couple1860 married couples doing married things587 married life115 milf14155 rainbow dash's parents387 sex181542 ship:windyhoof407 shipping265439 simple background635737 softcore4023 spread wings104770 stallion209478 straight188455 unshorn fetlocks52565 white background176302 windybetes409 wing hands3183 wing hold819 wingboner9927

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #903D
In North America, “Rooting for you” means “Cheering for you.”
In New Zealand, “Root” means “Fuck.”
Bow and Windy seem to put both together.
Trick Question
Magical Inkwell - Wrote MLP fanfiction consisting of at least around 1.5k words, and has a verified link to the platform of their choice

@Mooniedrop  
The comments I replied to were comments directed at me personally. I’m just slow at responding sometimes.
 
@Darth Sonic  
There aren’t any current studies because the “research” you’re quoting is bunk, and there isn’t any evidence to impel more research in that direction.
 
All I’m trying to point out is that the veracity of your sources is important. It has to be scientific to be scientific.
Trick Question
Magical Inkwell - Wrote MLP fanfiction consisting of at least around 1.5k words, and has a verified link to the platform of their choice

@Background Pony #4319  
@Mooniedrop  
It’s not ‘which institutions’, it’s whether or not a study passes peer review. The peer review system is designed to filter out unscientific garbage.
 
Here’s an actual scientific study from 1975: http://www.jstor.org/stable/583035
 
Things have improved substantially since then because the topic is no longer nearly as taboo now as it was 42 years ago. There aren’t a lot of research studies on the topic, however, because it’s not a common situation and there isn’t substantial evidence that it produces any specific difficulty in child-rearing or other family dynamics. So no, the assertion that “people in open marriages have problems” is inaccurate—and even if it weren’t, saying it in that way is prejudicial toward those of us (like me) who live in an open marriage and have no problems in our relationship at all.
Mooniedrop

@TricksterWolf  
what instituitions collate statistics that are acceptable to you? im pretty sure everyone can no-platform an opponents source of statistics. its pretty easy, after all, you just did it without expending even 20 calories and providing zero proof.
Background Pony #E4FA
@TricksterWolf  
Please provide a link to a credible publication then. Everything I happen to find comes from seemingly biased (one way or the other) sources.