For me personally, I sorta have a combined view of Zincy’s and 64’s mindset on existentialism.
And as for Jack, no one is truly right or wrong until proven otherwise. Unless he’s referring to a god of some kind, but even then it’s still an ignorant thing to say.
@BP I suppose one would be correct in that assumption. Though I’d wager we’d have it trickle down the other way, define the purpose so we can derive our morality from said purpose. One has to have a finish line, before you start the race.
Sixty, then explore this wonderful creation that is the internet. You’re walling yourself in with the obsticals you face rather then trying to find a way to surmount them.
For me personally, I sorta have a combined view of Zincy’s and 64’s mindset on existentialism.
And as for Jack, no one is truly right or wrong until proven otherwise. Unless he’s referring to a god of some kind, but even then it’s still an ignorant thing to say.
Okay you’re up then, what is right?
Same here, I just have to wrap up
a conversation in PMssomething and then I’ll be gone.I guess so.
But I have friends here, the only friends I know.
They’re the only thing keeping me from feeling alone all the time. Tho I suppose that’s not part of you philosophy.
I would think that morality would be a something to consider when deciding on a purpose.
What is happening, and what ought to happen are two very different things.
I suppose, but I don’t have a lot of money or a way to get around on my own.
I have no car or driver’s license.
But that does that make them any more “right” than an individual?
I can’t explore the planet, at least not right now.