@wumbl3
If that’s the case why not just use the “ambiguous gender” tag rather than just chose to say it’s rule 63, by the logic you’re giving the author hasn’t decided yet either so just putting ambiguous gender is the right thing to do rather than either of us putting a gender on this, hell maybe the artist might just make it futa or something else.
For the simple fact that if I’m gonna bed somebody, it’d be a girl. Spike is eye candy here - and I hate Tolsticot for making him so attractive -, but it’s not candy I want to have.
At least I’m pretty sure I don’t want to. Pretty sure.
…Shit, Tolsticot said even they didn’t know Spike’s gender here, did they? Auuuugh, that makes matters worse! Ambiguity is the best honey for a trap!
@EvilScotsman12
I changed them cause after looking at the source the artist states this is how they would draw spike(if they were to draw him), not stating it as Rule 63 or anything like that but spike, whoever posted it either didn’t read or didn’t care
@Spikey
Tags for when I saw this picture had Bard. So most like been changed since then. Though going from looks alone, looks like Barb to me given the feminine design.
wait, in the original post the artist still refers to this as Spike and not bard, neither does it say it’s gender swaped; why are you putting the tags for “Barb” and “implied lesbian” when the artist clearly intends for this to be just Spike and not Barb? I’m a just correct this
Now I’ve just added a femboy tag cause that’s how he looks to me
The dick makes it cuter.
Still cute.
SEXY YEAHHHHH
Geez, how off-model can you get? ;p
Edited
If that’s the case why not just use the “ambiguous gender” tag rather than just chose to say it’s rule 63, by the logic you’re giving the author hasn’t decided yet either so just putting ambiguous gender is the right thing to do rather than either of us putting a gender on this, hell maybe the artist might just make it futa or something else.
@Ponysouler
who wouldn’t?
I’d still tap it.
For the simple fact that if I’m gonna bed somebody, it’d be a girl. Spike is eye candy here - and I hate Tolsticot for making him so attractive -, but it’s not candy I want to have.
At least I’m pretty sure I don’t want to. Pretty sure.
…Shit, Tolsticot said even they didn’t know Spike’s gender here, did they? Auuuugh, that makes matters worse! Ambiguity is the best honey for a trap!
Edited
Why would you want to avoid this trap, looks like a lot of fun.
“Whoever posted”… Are you blind?
Even the artist is confused and doesn’t know. whatever you’re trying to do here. Stop it.
I changed them cause after looking at the source the artist states this is how they would draw spike(if they were to draw him), not stating it as Rule 63 or anything like that but spike, whoever posted it either didn’t read or didn’t care
Tags for when I saw this picture had Bard. So most like been changed since then. Though going from looks alone, looks like Barb to me given the feminine design.
it’s not barb, it’s actually just spike
Now I’ve just added a femboy tag cause that’s how he looks to me
Edited