@Scp-3125  
And that time may be sooner than we realize.

@Scp-3125  
correct

When society fails you you must destroy society

@Burger King Leonidas
 
Well of students do go more into the liberal arts, but in the long run, it turns out that less advantaged students in the liberal arts do fine, too.

@penguincascadia  
And I’ll counter that with a point from the comment section of that article.
 
“I’m wondering if the study controlled for family background/wealth. Could it be that students with more cultural/financial capital (i.e. a safety net) are more likely to take a chance on the humanities, and then their career trajectories are influenced to some extent by their privileged backgrounds, interpersonal skills, connections etc…? So we could be talking about correlation here rather than causation. (As a humanist I hope not, but it seems like an important question to ask.)” -Carcambo

@Twiface
 
 
@Background Pony #4D4C
 
It’s not accurate- liberal arts majors are employed as much as other majors are and earn much income:
 
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/01/22/see-how-liberal-arts-grads-really-fare-report-examines-long-term-data

On one hand, yow this series is cynical. On the other, it’s pretty darn accurate and very funny.

@Background Pony #5231  
They do have degrees, just really shitty low-effort ones.

Congratulations Graduates:  
You are no longer the future.

Contrary to popular misconception, children of rich parents don’t go into politics if they have no degree. These children are the hidden ones you hear little about.

Might I point out that by being close friends with 4 that´ll go into politics they will have a place there too because of the time honored tradition of nepotism? Or are done overinterpreting stuff for fun?^^

Go back to Griffonstone and become a missionary. problem solved.