Jacktheguy
"[@genervt":](/1920724#comment_7815885
)
But that’s what was so impressive about 2003 Grievous: even against Jedi Masters he was keeping up through sheer skill and ferocity. He only retreated when the odds were overwhelmingly against him (he only retreated when that LAAT gunship began opening fire on him). Even against a room of armed Clones and Senate guards he was able to outmaneuver them and cut them all down with little to no difficulty. Canon Grievous retreated all the time.
In my opinion, 2003 Grievous is far more impressive, intimidating and a more enjoyable rendition of the character. The other Grievous is just a typical, cowardly villain.
Oh and I tried that, but it never worked for some reason.
IT HUNGERS
But that’s what was so impressive about 2003 Grievous: even against Jedi Masters he was keeping up through sheer skill and ferocity. He only retreated when the odds were overwhelmingly against him (he only retreated when that LAAT gunship began opening fire on him). Even against a room of armed Clones and Senate guards he was able to outmaneuver them and cut them all down with little to no difficulty. Canon Grievous retreated all the time.
In my opinion, 2003 Grievous is far more impressive, intimidating and a more enjoyable rendition of the character. The other Grievous is just a typical, cowardly villain.
Oh and I tried that, but it never worked for some reason.