@Gangue
Normally that would be the case, but it’s currently tagged as safe. No real danger is happening in this animation with the exception of the softvore. As I said this is done in a cartoony way which is in a lot of kids cartoons. No death, digestion, gore, blood, sexually eaten, nothing at least in this animation. She ate her in a fast fluid way which is meant to spark humor more than the uncomfortable aspect of vore. I can name several cartoons now where this stuff happens and in most cases, the victim is spat back out. You currently seem to be the only one that has a problem with it. If the artist responds to you they can tell you, but as far as I know this isn’t overly bad to where it would end up as questionable. If you want to see where that tag is fitting, look at the other vore pics.
@Conversed Corruption
But the author themselves tagged this as questionable. If they thought it was safe for kids they’d tag it as such. This was not made for kids.
@Gangue
It’s soft vore done using cartoon physics. This is a method used in quite a lot of children’s cartoons that involve vore so we can assume that she isn’t digested in her stomach despite her stopping the struggle inside. If she swallowed her in a sexual way, ripped her apart beforehand, digested her, or did anything unsafe then yeah the tags would have to be changed, but this is done more comically than serious.
First of all, really good animation.
Second of all, Why does this count as safe? This doesn’t seem like something you’d want to argue for in being safe for kids.
That was me lmaooooo
Normally that would be the case, but it’s currently tagged as safe. No real danger is happening in this animation with the exception of the softvore. As I said this is done in a cartoony way which is in a lot of kids cartoons. No death, digestion, gore, blood, sexually eaten, nothing at least in this animation. She ate her in a fast fluid way which is meant to spark humor more than the uncomfortable aspect of vore. I can name several cartoons now where this stuff happens and in most cases, the victim is spat back out. You currently seem to be the only one that has a problem with it. If the artist responds to you they can tell you, but as far as I know this isn’t overly bad to where it would end up as questionable. If you want to see where that tag is fitting, look at the other vore pics.
Edited
But the author themselves tagged this as questionable. If they thought it was safe for kids they’d tag it as such. This was not made for kids.
It’s soft vore done using cartoon physics. This is a method used in quite a lot of children’s cartoons that involve vore so we can assume that she isn’t digested in her stomach despite her stopping the struggle inside. If she swallowed her in a sexual way, ripped her apart beforehand, digested her, or did anything unsafe then yeah the tags would have to be changed, but this is done more comically than serious.
Edited
Second of all, Why does this count as safe? This doesn’t seem like something you’d want to argue for in being safe for kids.
Edited because: Formatting didn't work as expected/
If the YCHs are at least 30 dollars. How much is a small animation like this?
Double stuffed to be specific. But I’ll forgive you by making you my new oreo. Bye bye.
Noooo!
Edited
Using the leash to pull her in like that is just perfect!
Love it~! <3