@Background Pony #AFFD
I investigated for myself after reading your comment and searched up the definition of foalcon. And according to the urban dictionary it says to have sexual interest in ponies that are the age of preteen humans. That sounds a lot like pedophilia to me, and foalcon seems to be a felony. Because I do know that child porn is illegal and pedophilia is a serious crime, and I’m glad that I’m not a pedophile as I said I don’t have a foalcon fetish, but it’s something which clearly sounds like that to me. I could call the police if I come across any other foalcon pictures on derpibooru, but most are probably explicit and I don’t like seeing explicit pictures. But any explicit pictures which depict a filly and are clearly foalcon need to possibly reported to your local law enforcement. Just making this comment as a warning, because foalcon is some felonious stuff.
@DarkyBoode32
Basically foalcon is a term derived from the same Japanese naming structure that gave rise to terms like Shotacon and Lolicon, which imply underaged(specifically like under 13, not between the ages of 13-18) character content of the male and female variety respectively along with erotic presentation/situations, as the terms are commonly used nowadays. You can find more about through google and wikipedia.
Foalcon in this context basically replaces the shota/loli with foal. As in a really young horse.
Shota/lolicon, foalcon and terms like that aren’t to be confused with terms like noncon and dubcon, which mean non-consent and dubious consent respectively.
Long story short. If somebody says. “You’re into foalcon” or something, they’re trying to imply you’re attracted to a pony character because they’re really young. Accusations like this unfortunately are more common than ever with all the witchhunts and drama going on amongst fandoms nowadays, so lots of people are more eager than ever to point fingers even if their accusations don’t necessarily make strict sense.
Not that I personally have a problem with your commenting style(because I don’t, because there are people on the website who make way more depraved-sounding comments and I don’t care about them either). But if you keep gravitating towards pictures of especially young characters and specifically drawing attention to your arousal in comments, you’re going to get certain kinds of responses in turn. That’s just how it be, man.
I feel like english isn’t your first language, so I would advise you to research unfamiliar terms if you come across them.
@Cuteamena™
I don’t even know what a foalcon is. I keep hearing that word everywhere on derpibooru but have no idea what it means or what it is. To me it sounds like falcon so I think it’s some kind of species of bird. But no, I have a Vore fetish and not a foalcon fetish or whatever that other thing you mentioned is. Also I wasn’t trying to mention my fetish there, but I was saying that I wanted to see more Vore content being made.
@Cuteamena™
I dunno man. People in general don’t really like to talk about fetishes unless they have it, and even then if what they’re hearing isn’t pleasant it can still be something they don’t wanna hear about even if it’s 100 percent relevant to their interests. Like watching your favourite youtuber only for them to start talking about fetishes and suddenly hearing “Oh yeah vore is awful, just people who wanna end the life of another person is terrible, murderers, they belong behind bars, fetishizing murder and cannibalism like that. If you like vore, turn yourself in.” and stuff like that. Dehumanising stuff that assumes the worst of a person based on their interests and defines them BY said interest.
You may not see it that way, but to outsiders anybody with an interest that “isn’t normal” all fall under the same general umbrella. It doesn’t matter if a person’s interest in what is classified as a “fetish” can actually be classified as platonic in nature so they don’t get aroused from it. To outsiders, it’s still considered fetishy so it’s still considered porn. And that mindset even permeates into things like youtube, where somebody could have a compilation of vore clips in media shown on TV and even though none of the clips have genitals or nudity or swearing or anything like that, it’s still considered mature JUST because somebody can get off to it.
You kinda made light of the fact that one of the characters almost choked too. Should you be told to not speak of it because people who’ve had traumatising experiences with asphyxiation, or have otherwise witnessed death might come through and special care should be taken not to offend them? We both know what your answer is going to be.
It’s not like the guy said he wanted to see Scootaloo in a sexual situation either, he just said that he wants to see more Scootaloo vore. If you’re judging him for that alone, and assuming you only found his comment because of your interest in vore and with the animation being what it is, and the fact that you probably liked the animation. What about you? Who are you trying to impress by being a comment section cop?
Besides. It’s an animation of Scootaloo gulping somebody down. It’s a vore animation with a foal in it. What are people going to talk about if not the foal or the person the foal is eating? The background? Please.
TL;DR: Maybe DON’T act like just being into vore(regardless of soft or hard or even endo) is enough to make you feel like you can take some kind of moral higher ground when you are already part of a subculture that has been stereotyped and even fetishized substantially by both insiders and outsiders. If you go to clean pictures and bring up vore you’re still very likely going to get chewed out by people and probably not very many will have the decency to be as faux-polite as you assuming you don’t just get ignored for making an irrelevant comment.
I mean don’t get me wrong, actual child predators and people who think it’s alright to shove their fetishes on other people against their will beyond comment section interactions that offer no consequence, should be dealt with appropriately. But to complain about foalcon, on a site that itself hosts foalcon, in the comment section of an animation that has a foal engaging(even if unexpectedly and somewhat unwillingly) in an act that is considered inherently sexual by many due to being associated with a fetish which itself means that if you found your way to the animation and commented on it in a non-hateful manner that you must like it enough to matter, and yet feel the need to judge somebody for being more vocal in their interest than you? What is your point even supposed to be?
Except she slipped in
Edited
I like nsfw, what I don’t like is creating nsfw content, do you see the difference?
Edited
no it’s not, i would never do anything explicit, no matter if its adult or filly
Edited
But at least it calmed down now
Edited
And also I actually do speak English as my first language and am only fluent in English.
I investigated for myself after reading your comment and searched up the definition of foalcon. And according to the urban dictionary it says to have sexual interest in ponies that are the age of preteen humans. That sounds a lot like pedophilia to me, and foalcon seems to be a felony. Because I do know that child porn is illegal and pedophilia is a serious crime, and I’m glad that I’m not a pedophile as I said I don’t have a foalcon fetish, but it’s something which clearly sounds like that to me. I could call the police if I come across any other foalcon pictures on derpibooru, but most are probably explicit and I don’t like seeing explicit pictures. But any explicit pictures which depict a filly and are clearly foalcon need to possibly reported to your local law enforcement. Just making this comment as a warning, because foalcon is some felonious stuff.
Basically foalcon is a term derived from the same Japanese naming structure that gave rise to terms like Shotacon and Lolicon, which imply underaged(specifically like under 13, not between the ages of 13-18) character content of the male and female variety respectively along with erotic presentation/situations, as the terms are commonly used nowadays. You can find more about through google and wikipedia.
Foalcon in this context basically replaces the shota/loli with foal. As in a really young horse.
Shota/lolicon, foalcon and terms like that aren’t to be confused with terms like noncon and dubcon, which mean non-consent and dubious consent respectively.
Long story short. If somebody says. “You’re into foalcon” or something, they’re trying to imply you’re attracted to a pony character because they’re really young. Accusations like this unfortunately are more common than ever with all the witchhunts and drama going on amongst fandoms nowadays, so lots of people are more eager than ever to point fingers even if their accusations don’t necessarily make strict sense.
Not that I personally have a problem with your commenting style(because I don’t, because there are people on the website who make way more depraved-sounding comments and I don’t care about them either). But if you keep gravitating towards pictures of especially young characters and specifically drawing attention to your arousal in comments, you’re going to get certain kinds of responses in turn. That’s just how it be, man.
I feel like english isn’t your first language, so I would advise you to research unfamiliar terms if you come across them.
I don’t even know what a foalcon is. I keep hearing that word everywhere on derpibooru but have no idea what it means or what it is. To me it sounds like falcon so I think it’s some kind of species of bird. But no, I have a Vore fetish and not a foalcon fetish or whatever that other thing you mentioned is. Also I wasn’t trying to mention my fetish there, but I was saying that I wanted to see more Vore content being made.
Edited
I dunno man. People in general don’t really like to talk about fetishes unless they have it, and even then if what they’re hearing isn’t pleasant it can still be something they don’t wanna hear about even if it’s 100 percent relevant to their interests. Like watching your favourite youtuber only for them to start talking about fetishes and suddenly hearing “Oh yeah vore is awful, just people who wanna end the life of another person is terrible, murderers, they belong behind bars, fetishizing murder and cannibalism like that. If you like vore, turn yourself in.” and stuff like that. Dehumanising stuff that assumes the worst of a person based on their interests and defines them BY said interest.
You may not see it that way, but to outsiders anybody with an interest that “isn’t normal” all fall under the same general umbrella. It doesn’t matter if a person’s interest in what is classified as a “fetish” can actually be classified as platonic in nature so they don’t get aroused from it. To outsiders, it’s still considered fetishy so it’s still considered porn. And that mindset even permeates into things like youtube, where somebody could have a compilation of vore clips in media shown on TV and even though none of the clips have genitals or nudity or swearing or anything like that, it’s still considered mature JUST because somebody can get off to it.
You kinda made light of the fact that one of the characters almost choked too. Should you be told to not speak of it because people who’ve had traumatising experiences with asphyxiation, or have otherwise witnessed death might come through and special care should be taken not to offend them? We both know what your answer is going to be.
It’s not like the guy said he wanted to see Scootaloo in a sexual situation either, he just said that he wants to see more Scootaloo vore. If you’re judging him for that alone, and assuming you only found his comment because of your interest in vore and with the animation being what it is, and the fact that you probably liked the animation. What about you? Who are you trying to impress by being a comment section cop?
Besides. It’s an animation of Scootaloo gulping somebody down. It’s a vore animation with a foal in it. What are people going to talk about if not the foal or the person the foal is eating? The background? Please.
TL;DR: Maybe DON’T act like just being into vore(regardless of soft or hard or even endo) is enough to make you feel like you can take some kind of moral higher ground when you are already part of a subculture that has been stereotyped and even fetishized substantially by both insiders and outsiders. If you go to clean pictures and bring up vore you’re still very likely going to get chewed out by people and probably not very many will have the decency to be as faux-polite as you assuming you don’t just get ignored for making an irrelevant comment.
I mean don’t get me wrong, actual child predators and people who think it’s alright to shove their fetishes on other people against their will beyond comment section interactions that offer no consequence, should be dealt with appropriately. But to complain about foalcon, on a site that itself hosts foalcon, in the comment section of an animation that has a foal engaging(even if unexpectedly and somewhat unwillingly) in an act that is considered inherently sexual by many due to being associated with a fetish which itself means that if you found your way to the animation and commented on it in a non-hateful manner that you must like it enough to matter, and yet feel the need to judge somebody for being more vocal in their interest than you? What is your point even supposed to be?
Wouldnt it be better to keep comments like that to yourself?
Foalcon is not a fetish people like to see or speak about.
This is my fetish, okay.
What the Fuck…
Must resist… making that joke…