Well let me explain it. To the people who can’t differ MH and EQG.

Etymologicly, EQG characters are based from their pony counterpart, like their skin and hair / mane color. So, they’re basically self-paradox, like Twilight went to human world, she still had her hair and color design in the same way as pony version of her. Indeed that she found Sunset at school, that’s why the movie plot is mainly at school theme. Meanwhile, MH is basically undead / monster people going to school.
In appearance, EQG design isn’t really the same as MH body design. While MH has Barbie’s cartoon face design with pale colors, refered to monster / undead people. EGQ has skinny body, slighty big head, and big eyes (refered to their pony counterpart), even though their skin also colored.
In naming the characters, EQG characters are canonnicaly named with mostly English words and 2 words only. While MH basically used common name for movie characters.
In other hand, EQG is spinoff and not main series (like TYT and PL), while MH is the main series itself.
So.
The Conclusion is, EQG and MH are the same as school girl cartoon but in different way. It means they are not completely same.

@Background Pony #9E25
Why did you choose to post foot fetish stuff??? Seriously bro

@Itsthinking  
This is da best comment I want to see!
 
Pony Awesomeness = Chemical X which made PPG Awesome
 
The chemical was invented by Faust for PPG, and Hasbro reuse it to make EQG.

WHAT THE HAY IS MONSTER HIGH DOING HERE!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

@Background Pony #21DB  
Ow, my head.

@Background Pony #B4DB  
You know what’s funny? That same artist also appears to like Ever After High from what I’ve seen on his DeviantART page, yet still dropped out of the fandom because of Equestria Girls.

I liked Equestria Girls.

Accurate enough for me.

@Background Pony  
Well, I mean, yeah, I could tell by all the merch they have in the store I work at.
 
Thing is, I just wasn’t sure if the fandom actually thought the cartoons based on the toyline were any good or if they simply just liked the character designs.

@romantiCaveman  
Monster High is really popular, even within ex-brony community that hates EqG.  
 

@romantiCaveman  
<brohoofs>

@Spiritus Arcane  
Thus, Equestria Girls was born! Which was…well, not the best thing ever, but certainly far from the worst thing ever.
 
Then again, I don’t really know about any of those other things. I mean, every time I see Monster High stuff in the store, I’m like “there is no way any sort of show based on skinny supposedly ‘monsterous’ Bratz dolls with weird skin colors could be any good.”
 
But then again, I’m sure a lot of people look at MLP merchandise the same way, so who am I to judge?

Monster High…
 
High School Musical…
 
And everything Bratz…
 
These were the things chosen to create the worst thing ever…
 
But Prof. Hasbro accidentally added an extra ingredient to the shitstorm…
 
CHEMICAL PONY!

@Zennistrad  
No, I’m guessing that the presumed intention of this edit is to mock how EqG appears to just be a mixing of three separate things. But the whole point of Chemical X is that it was added accidentally, and he was just trying to make “normal” little girls.
 
It was the Chemical X that made them awesome.
 
MLP made the best of an incredibly tired and boring concept it could.

@Itsthinking  
So My Little Pony makes anything terrible, then?

Equestria Girls’ girls actually look better than most cartoon girls from most Western shows. They look very anime-like.

The intention of this piece would work if Chemical X made something terrible instead of awesome.
 
Oh, and all of those three things suck. A lot.

Equestrian girls is Like an independent movie

No, no, don’t you see? By themselves, sugar, spice, and everything nice are useless crap. But when you add Chemical X to the mixture, you turn them into something awesome.
 
That’s how I’m reading it, and YOU CAN’T STOP ME.

@Zennistrad  
ok, eqg was not a great movie but i agree that is not so bad

Uh, no. EQG is nowhere near as bad as any of those thing.