@sirvancelot  

How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?

I am John Galt, and I challenge Big Brother!

Just thinking. Assuming of course we’re not dealing with five-  
dimensional objects in a basic Euclidean geometric universe and given  
the essential premise that all geo-mathematics is based on the  
hideously limiting notion that one plus one equals two, and not as  
{Astemeyer} correctly postulates that one and two are in fact the same  
thing observed from different precepts, the theoretical shape described by {Siddus} must therefore  
be a poly-dri-doc-deca-wee-hedron-ahexa-sexa-hedro-adicon-a-di-bi  
dolly-he-deca-dodron.  
Everything else is popycock. Isn’t that so?

@sirvancelot  
I wish I could vote this comment up.

For those who didn’t get it: this is about roman named 1984. That’s freaking obviously that 2+2 is 4, that is not the point at all.

Considering that you are rounding to the nearest integer with “large values of 2,” any further decimals are disregarded, so 2+2 still = 4.

@TheAbridgenator  
Twilight is kinda OCD person, also she is a leader, so i thought she wants to control the system and information accordingly  
.

@Joshua
 
Log2 ^64= 6
 
:)

Go and tell your king that the sky is falling in.

@Prof.NightJack  
I know what the joke is, I’m just saying that Twilight isn’t the type to specifically use this variety of doublethink. It’d be more like she’d say 2 + 2 can ONLY be 4, and no other subjective or faith based answers could be reached.

@TheAbridgenator  
Someone doesn’t know what the joke is really about.
 
@Joshua  
…. get out!

@Joshua  
No, dingbat, it’s obviously fish!

Wait! 2 + 2 isn’t 5, it’s 6!

Wait, wouldn’t 2 + 2 = 4 anyway, since Twilight’s kind of autocracy would involve a purely objective secularism that would crack down on any manner of misinformation and unfounded viewpoints?

For very large values of 2, clearly.