Uploaded by dt 
768x1024 JPG 72 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH suggestive195963 +-SH artist:bansan8 +-SH princess luna120590 +-SH human263523 +-SH g42106513 +-SH big breasts133380 +-SH breasts409786 +-SH busty princess luna10290 +-SH crown32081 +-SH female1884270 +-SH godiva hair367 +-SH horn229231 +-SH horned humanization8332 +-SH humanized123420 +-SH jewelry122261 +-SH nudity536803 +-SH pony coloring3313 +-SH regalia39406 +-SH sexy48852 +-SH solo1487344 +-SH solo female244436 +-SH strategically covered3764 +-SH winged humanization10385 +-SH wings243629
Loading...
Loading...
Wouldn’t you like to know.
@Background Pony#2B6B
Dem’s the rules. If you feel that strongly about it, you can discuss it here, or make your own forum topic, or PM a mod. Right now this image has Luna as a human, color and extra appendages notwithstanding, so it gets the humanized tag. Mark my words, you go tagging things like this as anthro and people will start complaining about how this is tagged wrong and that they want to filter humans.
Tagging this as anthro would be wrong, for the precise reason that she does not have a muzzle in this image.
I am done dealing with stupid people today, someone else take over.
takes his hat and leaves
Can we just enjoy the sexy and not discuss any further?
That’s pretty ridiculous to include things like wings and horns and other junk. Last time I checked human beings didn’t have horns and wings. Is there some sort of agenda going on? What’s wrong with tagging this as anthro? It’s more accurate and it reduces the clutter at the tags.
@Background Pony
@kassarc16
I think the stupidest thing I have seen in the last 24 hours is this whole needless discussion about the difference between anthro and humanized.
Must be you looking in a mirror.
If that’s literally the stupidest thing you’ve ever seen in your entire life, you must not interact with humanity very often, if at all.
omg this is literally the fucking stupidest thing i’ve ever seen in my life
what do you work for government
People tend to misapply it.
@Background Pony #2B6B
Also, the local tag definition for humanized:
“A non-human character drawn as a human. May include a tail, wings, pony ears, or a horn. For humanized art with tails, wings, pony ears, or horns include also the tags tailed humanization, winged humanization, eared humanization, or horned humanization, respectively.”
And there’s the “pony coloring” tag for humanizations that have skin colors equal to their pony form’s fur color.
No, the point of distinction between anthro and humanized is that a) anthros have muzzles, while humanized ponies have human faces and that b) anthros generally have fur, while humanized ponies generally do not.
It says generally. Doesn’t say anything about being a requirement. As I said, humanized implies a human character, this isn’t human.
The tag definition for an anthro is: “Anthros are bipedal versions of four-legged creatures or characters and may have all hooves or hooves and hands or hands and feet, depending on the style of the individual artist. Anthros generally have tails and muzzles. Also boobs.”
Important part highlighted. Do you see a muzzle here?
Is can this be “humanized” since the character in the picture is clearly not human. I agree with the gentleman, it’s ridiculous.
Yup. Silly Anon.
Anons making it obvious who they are is still the funniest thing in Derpibooru.
This is not anthro. Anthros have fur and a pony-like face. She obviously has a human face.
Changing
Muzzle=anthro
human face=humanized
oh, I saw 3 pictures that were human but with eqg skin and horse ears but i bet it was a mistake. I also made a mistake of going through semi-anthro.
No, semi-anthro is for when regular ponies are acting like anthros, like standing upright an holding things with their hooves and such. She’s human looking so that’s humanized.
Yes, yes
I noticed other pics have semi-athro, that might work.