@Background Pony #06E7  
I don’t think lawmakers should determine language. They can keep to their law thingy. Linguists and dictionary writers will give definitions that more accurately reflects how people use language.
 
To me the important thing is that the language effectively communicates what you’re trying to say, and often times legal definitions are very confusing and will just slow down conversations. If you tell someone you were raped, they’d assume you didn’t enjoy the experience. But legally its possible to rape someone who is consenting and enjoys the experience.

@Background Pony #06E7  
“Those are the last words made by the victim before their death.”

@Enkidu  
When you’re using legal language, you’d damn well better use the legal definition.
 
“HE MURDERED ME! Well, uh, not by the legal defintion, if you really care about that…”
 
Misdefining and corrupting legal language in the popular consciousness is how crusaders manage to twist the law to suit themselves.

@Background Pony #5AD9  
I think you have a different definition of rape to myself and the OP. That does not make the OP a duck. To some people, sex with a drunk/drugged person who has consented is rape, but I don’t use this definition.
 
Maybe that’s legally rape, but in language we don’t need to follow the law. To me, rape must involve one party who is does not want to be having sex at that moment. (so the gun example would still be rape, but the idea of the joke is that you can’t rape a person who wants to be raped, and that point still holds)

“TURN AROUND! BEND OVER! TAKE IT!”  
“YES! WHOOHOOOO!!! ALLLRRRRIIIGHT!!!”  
“… You don’t get how this works, do you?”  
“?”

by definition, you are correct

Well can’t you just suck the fun out of everything?

@Questionmarktarius  
I get it. :3

aside from the rapeseed scenario, the only other contextual possibility is that Fluttershy wanted to try something a little kinky (public/S&M) and whoever she was talking to was concerned about what would happen if anybody stumbled upon them in the act

I was hoping you’d say yes.

see also:  

@Prof.NightJack  
Yes, and…?

It’s only rape if you don’t like it…

@Background Pony #5AD9  
I think this was a joke, not meant to be taking seriously.

Wrong: it’s not rape if you consent, but saying the word “yes” is not necessarily consenting.
 
Like if I hold a gun to your head and tell you to say “yes”.
 
Or if I slipped you drugs.
 
It doesn’t count if that’s why you say “yes”.
 
Can we call OP a duck yet?

I just asked if you wanted some flowers, geez!

@Background Pony #571C  
>saying no to Yellowquiet
 
Haha, good one. What are you, gay?

Well, yeah. If you consent to having sex, it’s consensual sex then.

@Background Pony #A339  
If only SJWs would understand that and try to help, but to them rape is just as the law put it, any other way is not possible.
 
 
Ya I probably shouldn’t of said anything about them….

Ah, so the best way to prevent rape is consenting, a major problem in society will finally be solved

@Background Pony #571C  
Our current judges and law system in general doesn’t care since they define rape through consent of one side and female only!  
Basically, for them, male on male, female on female, and female on male rape do not exist. Only male on female. People are trying to change that.

good to know

“But what if I say no?”

Curses! foiled again!