@Alel
Eating a fellow sapient would have similar moral ramifications, yes. But “cannibalism” itself is a purely descriptive word for a very specific class of action and carries no inherent moral judgments in and of itself.
It’s just like you can say that bullying someone into hanging themselves is just as bad as strangling them yourself, but doing so does not make you a strangler, even if it may make you a murderer, because strangling is a descriptive term- not a moral one.
Saying that something is “no morally different than cannibalism” is not the same as saying that something is cannibalism.
@SeraphimDawn
She doesn’t want to be culturaly insensitive.
@Background Pony Numeral Uno
Some may argue that morality wise, in a context in wich there are different species that function similarly enough to consider each other “people”, eating each other would be no different than cannibalism. It’s more about the “spirit” behind the word than its semantics.
@Background Pony #F8D0
What philosophers are those? Sapience doesn’t even factor into the discussion. The term “cannibalism” applies just as much to non-sapient creatures eating their own species as it does to humans eating theirs. If it’s a different species, it can still be murder, but it ain’t cannibalism.
In Firefox there’s an even easier way to do it. Just tap “Alt” to bring up the menu, then “Tools” -> “Page Info” -> Click the “Media” tab and then use the arrow keys to quickly zip through the list until you find the picture you want. Then just hit the “Save As” button.
Of course, the more adventurous can just type “about:config” in the URL bar and change the “dom.event.contextmenu.enabled” setting to “false”. Then sites can’t use JavaScript to disable right-clicking.
Frankly, with so many ways around it, I really don’t understand why anyone would bother trying to code a blocker these days.
@Blissey1
It’s a legacy practice from the web in the ‘90s, to prevent users to “steal” resources. It was actually just plain annoying, so nobody does that anymore.
All the more there years, when it’s pretty much accepted that a client must have access to everything that’s being executed in its computer.
@DarkMageDragon
Whoa, nasty indeed. Just checked. Someone still uses right-click blockers, seriously?!
I’d use two methods:
using the browser’s developer tools, I can get the image source - not easy for everyone though;
enlarging the picture, copy the URL of the popup and remove the http://blog.naver.com/storyphoto/viewer.jsp?src= part, replacing %3A with ‘:’ and %2F with ‘/’.
The direct link for this one is http://blogfiles.naver.net/20141216_179/antlrdkdlaos_1418726422379Jkqbo_JPEG/fsdfds.jpg
How do you save the images that bluse posts on his site? Cause I try it the old click on the larger image and then right click and save, but it doesn’t work. So how is it done?
…My way’s funnier. :P
Probably just trying to keep anyone from running through it.
Eating a fellow sapient would have similar moral ramifications, yes. But “cannibalism” itself is a purely descriptive word for a very specific class of action and carries no inherent moral judgments in and of itself.
It’s just like you can say that bullying someone into hanging themselves is just as bad as strangling them yourself, but doing so does not make you a strangler, even if it may make you a murderer, because strangling is a descriptive term- not a moral one.
Saying that something is “no morally different than cannibalism” is not the same as saying that something is cannibalism.
She doesn’t want to be culturaly insensitive.
@Background Pony Numeral Uno
Some may argue that morality wise, in a context in wich there are different species that function similarly enough to consider each other “people”, eating each other would be no different than cannibalism. It’s more about the “spirit” behind the word than its semantics.
Panic.
Or maybe she tried, but there’s no magic in that world, who knows.
What philosophers are those? Sapience doesn’t even factor into the discussion. The term “cannibalism” applies just as much to non-sapient creatures eating their own species as it does to humans eating theirs. If it’s a different species, it can still be murder, but it ain’t cannibalism.
@BigMax
In Firefox there’s an even easier way to do it. Just tap “Alt” to bring up the menu, then “Tools” -> “Page Info” -> Click the “Media” tab and then use the arrow keys to quickly zip through the list until you find the picture you want. Then just hit the “Save As” button.
Of course, the more adventurous can just type “about:config” in the URL bar and change the “dom.event.contextmenu.enabled” setting to “false”. Then sites can’t use JavaScript to disable right-clicking.
Frankly, with so many ways around it, I really don’t understand why anyone would bother trying to code a blocker these days.
It’s a legacy practice from the web in the ‘90s, to prevent users to “steal” resources. It was actually just plain annoying, so nobody does that anymore.
All the more there years, when it’s pretty much accepted that a client must have access to everything that’s being executed in its computer.
@Background Pony #8FAA
Say what?
lol, why do you say that..
…those things exist?
…w-why would anyone do that!?
Whoa, nasty indeed. Just checked. Someone still uses right-click blockers, seriously?!
I’d use two methods:
http://blog.naver.com/storyphoto/viewer.jsp?src=
part, replacing%3A
with ‘:’ and%2F
with ‘/’.The direct link for this one is
http://blogfiles.naver.net/20141216_179/antlrdkdlaos_1418726422379Jkqbo_JPEG/fsdfds.jpg
I wonder how OP did it though.
GREAT LADIES!
I mean, that would seem feasible if it weren’t for the particles that look like what normally comes out of lava floating around them.
I mean, granted, now I realize that it could be soup, but it still looks like lava to me.
That’s a cauldron of soup.
Obviously.