This artist has already seemed to create a topical trend with his/her art, in which supports the idea that this is indeed safe.
erm… really?
you do realize that a lot of Augustbebels stuff is non-ambiguous fatal digestion, sometimes complete with disposal, right?
agreed some times even to an upsetting standpoint with favs going bye bye good thing i understand the concept of alternate reality go redipred and sweetie belly!
@JJMDude
Sometimes it feels like fatal unwilling is all the prolific vore artists do, so it’s a relief to us softies when something like this comes about, IMO
@Background Pony #9437
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. the vast majority of this so called “implied fatal” stuff is perfectly ambiguous. the supposed fatality is all in the eyes of the viewer.
I must disagree, but that’s why I read the blogs and posts of those artists, to see what they like in vore. And from everything i’ve seen and read, I would dare say 90% of them prefer fatal and/or digestion. That, complemented with the kind of implications that don’t just come from the one picture, but from many of what’s in the artist’s gallery creates a heavy associative trend, in which effectively ruins even the hope of true topical ambiguity and the idea that it could be safe. Remember, if it truly was ambiguous, then naturally we will assume, based on that extraordinary dichotomy between the number of safe vore to non-safe vore, that it is non-safe.
I often have to ask questions myself to confirm the opposite, like asking ‘will the prey be ok?’ or, ‘The fella isn’t gunna gut hurt right?’. What I get is almost always a ‘lolno’ or a ‘He/she’ll reform so its ok!’. It disturbs me to no end; and this artist is something I’ve actually been wanting to become myself - if only to introduce more nonfatal vore into the community.
As with pics like these, the biggest thing I get from them is that it does not imply any sort of harm to the voree, and that visually makes it out again. I love the merging idea where she is alive, conscious, and positively responsive like their bodies became one~. This artist has already seemed to create a topical trend with his/her art, in which supports the idea that this is indeed safe. Above all, this is what i’m going off of. OF course, if I were to draw my own, I would simply state in my userpage that I don’t do non-safe vore XD
It is ambiguous, but if you compare the amount of unambiguous fatal and non-fatal pics, there still seems to be more fatal. And even in a few ambiguous pictures, sometimes it’s still made pretty clear that it’s fatal.
@Background Pony #9437
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. the vast majority of this so called “implied fatal” stuff is perfectly ambiguous. the supposed fatality is all in the eyes of the viewer.
I can see the appeal in both fatal and non-fatal, though I prefer non-fatal myself. The root of these comments is mostly in the fact that the majority of vore art nowadays (and the rest of the vore art by this artist) is either fatal or implied fatal. It’s only natural for us non-fatal fans to feel relieved if a particularly good picture breaks that trend.
still, I’d just love if people would stop doing this kind of thing on both sides, not just have it happily happen to them only on the side that they prefer more.
@Background Pony #CF68
oh yeah, because those people are awesome in vore posts’ comments, not to mention great at making sure to dislike any vore piece they find not suiting their preference.
no no, I understand you perfectly, so let’s talk more about how much better this is than the Fatal ones for no reason.
@JJMDude
I can’t help but find it a little silly to see you chastise people about not respecting other preferences, at the same time that you call them obnoxious for stating their own preference.
Anyway, this ought to have a “harmless vore” or “cute vore” tag, which would fit with some Tatzljack pictures too.
agreed some times even to an upsetting standpoint with favs going bye bye good thing i understand the concept of alternate reality go redipred and sweetie belly!
Oh hell, you right, I’ve completely mixed up this artist with another….
Ohlol XD
Nevermind then…..
erm… really?
you do realize that a lot of Augustbebels stuff is non-ambiguous fatal digestion, sometimes complete with disposal, right?
@Blissey1
I must disagree, but that’s why I read the blogs and posts of those artists, to see what they like in vore. And from everything i’ve seen and read, I would dare say 90% of them prefer fatal and/or digestion. That, complemented with the kind of implications that don’t just come from the one picture, but from many of what’s in the artist’s gallery creates a heavy associative trend, in which effectively ruins even the hope of true topical ambiguity and the idea that it could be safe. Remember, if it truly was ambiguous, then naturally we will assume, based on that extraordinary dichotomy between the number of safe vore to non-safe vore, that it is non-safe.
I often have to ask questions myself to confirm the opposite, like asking ‘will the prey be ok?’ or, ‘The fella isn’t gunna gut hurt right?’. What I get is almost always a ‘lolno’ or a ‘He/she’ll reform so its ok!’. It disturbs me to no end; and this artist is something I’ve actually been wanting to become myself - if only to introduce more nonfatal vore into the community.
As with pics like these, the biggest thing I get from them is that it does not imply any sort of harm to the voree, and that visually makes it out again. I love the merging idea where she is alive, conscious, and positively responsive like their bodies became one~. This artist has already seemed to create a topical trend with his/her art, in which supports the idea that this is indeed safe. Above all, this is what i’m going off of. OF course, if I were to draw my own, I would simply state in my userpage that I don’t do non-safe vore XD
It is ambiguous, but if you compare the amount of unambiguous fatal and non-fatal pics, there still seems to be more fatal. And even in a few ambiguous pictures, sometimes it’s still made pretty clear that it’s fatal.
Couldn’t agree more.
Can we just go back to appreciating this for what it is and maybe, just maybe stop this talk about the other type?
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. the vast majority of this so called “implied fatal” stuff is perfectly ambiguous. the supposed fatality is all in the eyes of the viewer.
I can see the appeal in both fatal and non-fatal, though I prefer non-fatal myself. The root of these comments is mostly in the fact that the majority of vore art nowadays (and the rest of the vore art by this artist) is either fatal or implied fatal. It’s only natural for us non-fatal fans to feel relieved if a particularly good picture breaks that trend.
I know
I meant in the comments
nope, It’s borrowing the body and then letting the pony out when you’re done with it’s body.
yeah..
still, I’d just love if people would stop doing this kind of thing on both sides, not just have it happily happen to them only on the side that they prefer more.
oh yeah, because those people are awesome in vore posts’ comments, not to mention great at making sure to dislike any vore piece they find not suiting their preference.
no no, I understand you perfectly, so let’s talk more about how much better this is than the Fatal ones for no reason.
this image has converted me to the Vore side of the Horse
Curse You, Harmless Vore!!!!
(please make more)
I can’t help but find it a little silly to see you chastise people about not respecting other preferences, at the same time that you call them obnoxious for stating their own preference.
Anyway, this ought to have a “harmless vore” or “cute vore” tag, which would fit with some Tatzljack pictures too.
nah, it was done too cute and consensual and nothing-bad-happening to be disturbing
You ain’t seen nothing yet.