It credits shydale as the creator of the original image. Shydale isn’t the creator of this image, though: this is a reproduction in an entirely different medium by a different artist.
As a comparison, Lennie Mace’s Mona a’la Mace is a reproduction of the Mona Lisa in ballpoint pen, but da Vinci isn’t credited as the artist for that, because he didn’t make it.
There’s nothing technical about it. An image hand-drawn in a different medium isn’t a trace. I’ll talk to the other admins about the artist tag, but speaking as an artist myself, I would be leery about including it. It would be like including the show animators and designers on scene reinterpretations.
I have to agree with Blissey; fshydale still deserves credit for the original as it’s clearly drawing a ton of “inspiration” from another one of his pics.
It credits shydale as the creator of the original image. Shydale isn’t the creator of this image, though: this is a reproduction in an entirely different medium by a different artist.
As a comparison, Lennie Mace’s Mona a’la Mace is a reproduction of the Mona Lisa in ballpoint pen, but da Vinci isn’t credited as the artist for that, because he didn’t make it.
except we do do that. that’s what the “scene interpretation” tag is; it says “this is an artist’s reproduction of a scene from the show”
I mean heck, the source even credits fshydale as the original artist!
@And Brother I Hurt People
There’s nothing technical about it. An image hand-drawn in a different medium isn’t a trace. I’ll talk to the other admins about the artist tag, but speaking as an artist myself, I would be leery about including it. It would be like including the show animators and designers on scene reinterpretations.
@Archonix
I have to agree with Blissey; fshydale still deserves credit for the original as it’s clearly drawing a ton of “inspiration” from another one of his pics.
so why’d you remove “artist:fshydale”? Even if it’s not technically a trace, it’s still a reproduction of another persons work