@Background Pony #6024
Not necessarily. You don’t need to know the enemy’s enemy in this situation, just that you both share a common enemy. They could be a group you never met, someone you are close to, or another enemy that’s less bad.
@Background Pony #6024
Not necessarily. You don’t need to know the enemy’s enemy in this situation, just that you both share a common enemy. They could be a group you never met, someone you are close to, or another enemy that’s less bad.
@Background Pony #6024
Nah, not necessarily. There was no predicate condition that the person who is the enemy of your enemy is ALSO your enemy. She’s assuming a malicious state where none is justified by the premises.
She is though, as I explained earlier.
Not necessarily. You don’t need to know the enemy’s enemy in this situation, just that you both share a common enemy. They could be a group you never met, someone you are close to, or another enemy that’s less bad.
Nah, not necessarily. There was no predicate condition that the person who is the enemy of your enemy is ALSO your enemy. She’s assuming a malicious state where none is justified by the premises.