Tag Aliases - Read the first page before suggesting.

Gijinka -> humanized  
The former is basically the japanese of the latter, making it redundant.

multicolored eyes -> heterochromia

@Marukomuru
 
why should we alias a tag that doesn’t exist?

@Mildgyth  

 
I did just fix the 8-or-so images that were previously in that tag, and I was thinking that in the event that someone does decide to use that tag again, they can be pointed in the right direction pre-emptively.

flutterpony (30), flutter ponies (62) → flutter pony (184)

appledashtwilutterity pie [28] and princess trflutairaippinkle spdjacshiearkle [8] to appleflaritwidashpie [37] - all fusions of the entire mane six.

Pages 75 and 76 done.

artist:bronycane → artist:nao-shii
 
DA name change

The OC’s actual name is Cupcake Slash ^{[“source”:http://wubcakeva.deviantart.com/art/Base-Edit-Name-s-Slash-Cupcake-Slash-555700404}  
oc:wubcake (23) -> oc:cupcake slash (2)

laying on back (189) -> on back (6491)
 
Despite the spelling, all 189 images are of ponies or humans lying on their back. Noone is being laid on their backs.

trixiebuse → trixabuse

artist:crimsonandchaos -> artist:dr-whiskey
 
DA namechange

technical advanced -> technically advanced

artist:wonkake -> artist:wonton soup
 
The former is the artist’s Twitter username

artist:rain-hatchett → artist:relentless-rain
 
rain-hatchett is the FA name while relentless-rain is the DA name.

artist:milky-white-tan = artist:theonedzaan
 
Same artist

artist:wetfoxart Is only called wetfox on DA.

Cewestia (993) => cutelestia (837)  
Not sure if there is a real difference, cewestia seems to be used for the young foal Celestia version, while cutelestia is for all the other ones. So maybe it only should be a implication instead?

@Mad Black  
An alias definitely would be wrong, “filly” isn’t the same as “cute”. An implication could work…
 
btw If we change something, we might as well do the same thing with Woona and the corresponding cute Luna tag (that I can’t find right now…)

ears down (172) -> floppy ears (9040)

party favour -> party favor
 
Currently, it’s implied one-way, as opposed to being aliased like shining armour is.
 
Since then there’ve been…six images tagged “party favoUr” but any subsequent “party favor”-tagged images are gonna have that added alongside anyway as it is even if I go back and untag or switch them with the other spelling. It doesn’t even work the other way around.
 
This would also apply to equal foursome, which apparently doesn’t even imply the regular “party favor” tag but implies the spelling with the U.

grinning (98) → grin (8399)

@Mad Black  
Cewestia is the same as filly (usually pinkmaned) Celestia (the same way Woona is filly Luna). Cutelestia is any sufficiently cute Celestia image.
 
Niether alias nor implication would work in my opinion. Mostly because what is cute is highly subejective, while filly is a bit more objective.
 
Plus you have tags like woonabuse, meaning crap like >>606193 would ne classified as “cute.”
 
@Yoshimon1  
Lunabetes
 
Then again to keep consistency we’d have to “implication-y” all the filly tags like “filly twilight”, “fillyshy”, etc. And we run into the aforementioned subjectivity of what is “cute”.

@Soarinjack  
That’s why I said “If we change something”.
 
I agree about the subjectivity. We should just leave everything as it is.

blender3d -> blender
 
Also, there are a few images with actual blenders (you can find some using “blender, -3d”); would “blender (object)” be a good name for a new tag?