@Background Pony #4CF2
I’m not really against uploading higher-res versions either. They deserve to be preserved on this website somewhere.
I’m just saying if we’re trying to bring in the nebulous concept of “fairness” into this whole topic, then there are two sides to the question of how merges should be handled.
@soundtea
Wow, I did not know FA and Tumblr had such tiny file size limits. (10MB is kinda small.) So I guess my second point isn’t completely accurate.
@And Brother I Hurt People
I’m not talking about you in particular. If this is what you’re doing, then it’s probably for the best. But I was originally trying to make a point about merging in general…
Tho you do make a good point. I didn’t account for people derping up the original uploads, and these merges just to be to get the art to the original (full) post size. That does make it a lot less probable that these merges are for art that was produced by pro artists.
@redweasel
Yeah, now there’s an interesting point.
Some would say what is fair for all images is that each gets a single shot to be seen. Others would argue that some art is under appreciated and deserves more visibility. Which one of these views is more “fair” is probably the sort of question we will never really have an answer to…
Tho, if we accept that some art is under-appreciated, then we also kinda have to accept that figuring out which art qualifies as under-appreciated is pretty subjective. In the end, it boils down to: How well do I think this art should’ve done, and does it already have that sort of score?
I’m now kinda on-the-fence when it comes to the question of what is fair (especially in lieu of what Soundtea and And Brother I Hurt People have brought up).