Uploaded by Alvrexadpot
866x726 PNG 390 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2257576 +-SH artist:alvrexadpot54 +-SH fluttershy268050 +-SH human266288 +-SH g42118157 +-SH clothes673139 +-SH female1897795 +-SH hijab412 +-SH humanized123929 +-SH islam402 +-SH islamashy202 +-SH looking away6212 +-SH looking up25717 +-SH rain8347 +-SH religion793 +-SH solo1497865 +-SH sweater20564 +-SH sweatershy3689 +-SH winged humanization10424
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
… We have every right to view it negatively. Cultural Relatavism is a sham.
Perhaps, though I do feel her being Muslim can also work. One simply nerds to remember the majority of Muslims are not terrorist extremists.
The only issue I can see with Fluttershy being Muslim is in the treatment and role women have is such a culture, and how especially the USA such is viewed negatively.
I think she would be more of a Buddhist to be honest.
I want to upvote this comment, but I can’t, so here’s a picture expressing my gratitude.
And hosting an MLP art site you are; trekking through the bs 24/7, you still stand triumphant.
And we love you for it in our own creepy way.
life is a bitch , deal with the consequences
Well, you’re still doing that.
Albeit with somewhat more shit than one would imagine.
The sophistry is strong in you.
No where was it said that all religions were inherently hostile or war-mongering, those are your words. Projecting much? Nor was any argument made in regards to atheists, who only make up about 16% of the world population, mind you. That said, anyone can have radical views, anyone can become violent, however there can be direct links drawn to Abrahamic based religions and terrorist acts as well as religiously motivated power hunger despots.
Yes, there have been some atheists in power that caused human atrocities, however none of their motivations where done in the name of atheism. The whole argument trying to draw correlation has no merit, it is a logical fallacy.
Also, look up the meaning of irony, you are using it wrong. Please return when you have a formal education and know how to present a proper argument.
Opinions are like assholes. You can stick your dick inside it and it isn’t gay as long as balls don’t touch.
@Blissey1
I think he was referring to canonicity, not the contents of the picture.
@Background Pony #F48B
Hey, buddy, listen, there is a wonderful invention known as human decency out right now. You don’t even have to buy it or be gifted it; you just have to know how to use it. If you got banned for a day like you did, then you probably didn’t use this wonderful invention.
@Background Pony #4109
“Judaism responsible for the woes of the word for centuries”
Call me back when you start making sense, darling.
Regardless, you can’t say they’re all bad. Yea, sure, people have done horrible things in the name of religion before, and that will only go away once religion does, but can you honestly say that all religions are inherently hostile or war-mongering? Certainly not most and not even some. Can you really say that atheists as a whole are any better, like Stalin, who persecuted people because of having religious beliefs among other things? Really, your “anti-all-religion” stance paints religion and non-religion in the same black and white absolutes that have plagued many religions themselves. Irony much?
Honestly I am anti all religion. They all suck, they are all terrible with Christianity and Judaism being just responsible for the woes of the world over the centuries. It is unfortunate these Abrahamic beliefs have such the large influence on the ignorant masses they do and continue to get innocent people caught in their on going wars.
Perhaps, but with the possible exceptions of America or Isreal, none of those are immediate problems.
That said, he really should be using filters. Site rules and all that.
Or at least be consistent and post similar comments under pro-Communist, pro-Christian, pro-American, pro-German, and pro-Israel images.
Muslims don’t have a monopoly on violent, bigoted subcultures.
I believe the technical term is “civil disobedience.”
You signed up for a website and agreed to its terms of use, broke those terms, and then act like the mods are being unreasonable to responding to it?
The only people who have a say what is and is not allowed here are the admins, I’ll let them argue that amongst themselves.
The point, as has been stated, is that without context, no one would make the connection. The argument made is that so far removed from the source material it might as well be considered a completely original work. The fact is we know it is, at least in part, inspired by fluttershy, so I do not see an issue with it being posted here.
Far as those making cultural references, no matter whay side of the argument they are on they are morons.