Uploaded by Background Pony #D583
768x432 00:04.16 GIF 19.91 MBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2242456 +-SH artist:blueblaze95292 +-SH fluttershy266341 +-SH parasprite2304 +-SH pegasus525836 +-SH pony1673087 +-SH g42103850 +-SH 3d127943 +-SH animated130253 +-SH eating14201 +-SH eyes on the prize6990 +-SH female1880853 +-SH fetish59947 +-SH flutterpred812 +-SH gif61101 +-SH licking28981 +-SH licking lips5832 +-SH lidded eyes52279 +-SH looking at you276619 +-SH mare788446 +-SH predation352 +-SH puffy cheeks5282 +-SH smiling423488 +-SH smirk19035 +-SH source filmmaker69765 +-SH swallowing3034 +-SH throat bulge5178 +-SH tongue out154347 +-SH vore19950 +-SH youtube link13222
Loading...
Loading...
Let people enjoy things
I actually agree with you. Anything can be your fetish and some people do find it arousing to be eaten, I even have the Vore fetish myself I find it sexual but others may not. Some people also have dendrophilia which is a fetish for trees and trees aren’t things that are inherently sexual. So I do find it weird why the derpibooru admins have marked Vore as suggestive and questionable.
Fluttershy: You sure look beautiful Mr. Parasprite, get in my mouth! Ah! Ah! Ah! I said get in my mouth Mr. Parasprite!
TGMthen she should eat some food now
@gftrym
Parasprites only multiply after they eat, so if Fluttershy hasn’t eaten anything recently, then she’ll probably be fine.
Edited
this will end in explosions…or expansion?
Doesn’t matter. Mods/admins ruled that it’s fetish content so it’s rated questionable. They made a thread debating whether or not there should be a tag for non-sexual vore but basically came to the conclusion that’d be pretty much impossible to define so maybe eventually but for now nope.
things on the show perhaps aren’t inherently sexual no, but this piece of work isn’t from the show, is it? It’s a piece created by an artist who is known for making all sorts if voreish questionable content. while stuff viewed on public TV maybe isn’t inherently sexual, this isn’t from public TV, it’s a piece of fluttershy swallowing another living creature, licking her lips, and giving the camera a somewhat lewd look.
Given that it’s made by someone who in the past has made all sorts of lewdish voreish things, plus the way flutters licks her lips and gives that look to the camera, I’m uncertain that calling it ‘safe’ would be the best course of action, because it obviously wasn’t intended to be. If you have an issue with that, take it up with seb, not me.
also I was somewhat mistaken with my previous statement, not everything tagged as vore has to be ‘inherently sexual’ but when a work is intended as such (in the above) it’s usually a good idea to mark it as such. I doubt that’s going to change anytime soon.
TGM1.) Everything is somebody’s fetish.
2.) I can see nothing suggestive in this image.
3.) All of this is from the show.
Do you have a real argument? Any actual response to anything I wrote in that post you replied to?
vore is classified as a fetish. fetishes are inherently sexual. This was made by a vore artist, and it’s suggestive.
Edited
The act of swallowing something that isn’t dead is an extremely common visual in modern media that has many decades of history. When it isn’t presented in an obviously sexual way, I can see no reason at all that it needs to be branded as “inherently sexual”. Nothing about this image is any different in its presentation from what I linked above, and I firmly believe the show should really be our baseline for what counts as safe on this site.
Vore is inherently sexual.